IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

"Paul, Manuel" <Manuel-Paul@telekom.de> Fri, 21 November 2008 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409AB28C117; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:26:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84DA3A6AD1 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:55:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gk9-t1fL382P for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tcmail12.telekom.de (tcmail12.telekom.de [217.5.214.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586473A6A93 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from S4DE9JSAANM.ost.t-com.de (S4DE9JSAANM.ost.t-com.de [10.125.177.122]) by tcmail11.telekom.de with ESMTP for 73attendees@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:55:09 +0100
Received: from S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de ([10.125.177.223]) by S4DE9JSAANM.ost.t-com.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:55:09 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:54:51 +0100
Message-Id: <40FB0FFB97588246A1BEFB05759DC8A00261B72C@S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de>
In-Reply-To: <D660D11E35739B42A5DF6103C95C63CC0347172D@S4DE9JSAANL.ost.t-com.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Thread-Index: AclLd0z1AH+l2l0ZQlWmZ3mDcnlz3wAKQaJQ
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net><008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer><20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org><B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com><20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org><046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk><3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com><DC5BB921-5538-4BAE-B433-43C10EEAE80E@nokia.com><4926070E.1080900@krsek.cz> <D660D11E35739B42A5DF6103C95C63CC0347172D@S4DE9JSAANL.ost.t-com.de>
From: "Paul, Manuel" <Manuel-Paul@telekom.de>
To: <73attendees@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2008 06:55:09.0131 (UTC) FILETIME=[17B741B0:01C94BA6]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:26:44 -0800
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

> As a nethead, I am deeply opposed to the idea of a "carrier-grade"
> IETF ship.  But if you call it a "large-scale ocean-based meeting
> venue", then it's fine of course.
> -- 
> Simon.

Unfortunately I can not agree - I'd preferably rely on a carrier-grade
steered ship! 
Having a large scale thing without any idea where it is cruising around
would rather play in the hands of the pirates (already waiting...).
Arriving maybe somewhere, having lost half of the critical load without
knowing where and why that happened is surely not the right thing to
satisfy any customers...

...not that I don't know that cruising around can be more fun
occasionally!

Manuel
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email