Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Scott Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 19:12 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2C43A6A13;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:12:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D723E3A6A13;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:12:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id YrmWA2trWH0O; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:12:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139E23A6A0C;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:12:51 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,626,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="197063108"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196])
by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2008 19:12:50 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238])
by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAIJCoMS004647;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:12:50 -0800
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com
[64.102.31.12])
by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAIJCnHn016448;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:12:50 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by
xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:12:49 -0500
Received: from cisco.com ([64.102.8.172]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:12:49 -0500
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:53:43 -0600
From: Scott Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
To: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20081118165343.GA8992@cisco.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, 73attendees@ietf.org,
ietf@ietf.org
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn>
<3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net>
<20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov>
<4922EFDD.6090900@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4922EFDD.6090900@psg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2008 19:12:49.0253 (UTC)
FILETIME=[A590A950:01C949B1]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=809; t=1227035570; x=1227899570;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=sbrim@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Scott=20Brim=20<sbrim@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[73attendees]=20Is=20USA=20qualified=20
for=0A=092.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-crite
ria? |Sender:=20;
bh=lMgMrCE95RZRoY7vHnyuDyRN1Ixdg7wPg7RYjIbK5wQ=;
b=Q38DRsx+FYhAFPjMC7ADb1W4MFb+Ste8ABAYjAA81jCsh5JjdtrOKsPWLr
DPGODZAuYCEmU89WSVZ/+WOwr9Zp58zRf9FqZv5Q0d3q+5A4uI4ve09Bdt/a
CWgU9OYD5N;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=sbrim@cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified
for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Excerpts from Randy Bush on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 10:39:57AM -0600: > qdang@nist.gov wrote: > > I believe our US government would like to grant visas to as many > > people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend a meeting in > > the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can imagine there will > > be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting in CA next year > > alone. > > thank you for demonstrating so clearly the jingoistic prejudice at the > us government level that should preclude ietf being held in the united > states. How would you solve the problem? Let 100 million people in on false pretenses? I'm not going to defend the behavior of the US government, but I want you to admit that US immigration has a difficult problem. Slinging labels around doesn't help. _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda