Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Sat, 22 November 2008 19:19 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7375C3A6AAB;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:19:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9C53A6AAB
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:19:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id W+wF0CRCM0Cl for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:19:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D343A680E
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:19:26 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,650,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="199766645"
Received: from sj-dkim-8.cisco.com ([171.68.10.93])
by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2008 19:19:25 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254])
by sj-dkim-8.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAMJJP7R021491;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:19:25 -0800
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199])
by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAMJJOlG023101;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:19:24 GMT
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:18:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Dale Worley <dworley@nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1227284302.4026.1.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0811221106500.8444@pita.cisco.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org>
<B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
<3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
<492604FD.8090306@huawei.com>
<282BEBBE-1C44-4EC9-9CE5-3908E7B53A81@fugue.com>
<1227284302.4026.1.camel@victoria-pingtel-com.us.nortel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=861; t=1227381565; x=1228245565;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim8002;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Ole=20Jacobsen=20<ole@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[73attendees]=20Is=20USA=20qualified=20
for=202.3=20of=0A=20draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection
-criteria? |Sender:=20;
bh=YEayYWYETrAqDfwTqvdLByGiVCwBaDS74HYhSOX+MkE=;
b=MJRlGVDK5iL7bEttvGZYVaW2XEbZiMXotvHP3XdU5CWg1aUf29HvHEy8ta
0X4JZPxVFtpFcOAER4EvkmVYK8CeO7SWwJ7csKaLr5INfzpSwBqOWc7z+KNq
kfH0Srf/vV;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-8; header.From=ole@cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/sjdkim8002 verified; );
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
The IAOC decided to get well ahead of the curve on this one and we tested the solution in Dublin ;-): http://www.yikes.com/~ole/store/IAOC-copter.JPG Nice ride. Shiny and black as you would expect. Seating limited to about 5 plus the pilot. Capital expense and operations cost on the "high to extreme" side, but very enjoyable. View of CityWest from a different angle: http://www.yikes.com/~ole/store/CityWest.JPG Ole Note well: No ISOC, IETF, IAOC or other community funds were expended on this little adventure. On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Dale Worley wrote: > > > It would be more efficient to install a helipad and use helicopters to > take participants directly from their home countries to the venue ship. > (I suppose this doesn't work for landlocked countries, but there aren't > very many of them.) > > Dale > > _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley