Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 20:30 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494973A6AAD;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:30:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA29F3A6AAD
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:30:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Azb3UHcHXEzV for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16803A6895
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:30:10 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,627,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="106603572"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21])
by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2008 20:30:10 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254])
by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAIKUAQJ032723;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:30:10 -0800
Received: from stewart-bryants-computer.local ([10.21.72.246])
by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAIKU9qK014268;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:30:10 GMT
Message-ID: <492325D1.7000703@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:30:09 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Song Haibin <melodysong@huawei.com>
References: <01a401c9494b$eae43910$0c0ca40a@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <01a401c9494b$eae43910$0c0ca40a@china.huawei.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=283; t=1227040210; x=1227904210;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=stbryant@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Stewart=20Bryant=20<stbryant@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[73attendees]=20Is=20USA=20qualified=20
for=202.3=09ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-crite
ria? |Sender:=20;
bh=lpQBMP8bxcL57PQBHpn9pY5lxQMqjbxMuR3hRFSEXPE=;
b=p8GXsPXOuMOsSCVtuyWb5fT85zqSZRkStUNjAXR7RV1cC2VQJsPO56ahRD
BPG0BK4Koix68HVIwCVeS1ATQ8je1DlMyAyZDbHslTMllPiEIVLJLypgVSG7
lXxO8/0EAewZnzfU67JFlZqkqIvNmHCu1ncQGrN6tv3OHsC4tOsWA=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=stbryant@cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for
2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
> Song Haibin wrote: > What can I say? > > > > Well could you comment on the difficulty of getting a Chinese visa to attend an ITU-T meeting in the run up to the Olympics and the sudden change of application dates and process by the Chinese government? Stewart _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley