Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 22 November 2008 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCAA28C0FD;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD69528C0FD
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Kv9xdWxJVy1s for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7847A28C0FC
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.95.247] (helo=rmac.psg.com)
by ran.psg.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>)
id 1L3xs1-0005fB-I2; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:10:17 +0000
Message-ID: <49285918.7060705@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:10:16 -0600
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org> <B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com> <20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk> <3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
<a123a5d60811210913j62a9509fn45004d79472c956d@mail.gmail.com>
<3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com>
<96152831-7235-446F-91F1-3B660BA431F3@muada.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.63.0811211732020.18335@pita.cisco.com> <a123a5d60811221053n7b3b4ad6oc4cdc28e37b3ffc7@mail.gmail.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.63.0811221105370.8444@pita.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0811221105370.8444@pita.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Ole Jacobsen wrote: > Right, so what can we do to help? wait a year or so and hope for change in the usg. until then, do not arrange meetings in the states. e.g. any upcoming interim. randy _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley