IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Kaminsky Bug Options Include "Do Nothing, " Says IETF

Phillip Hallam-baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 20 November 2008 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6746E3A6A49; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:39:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3DA3A689E for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:39:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7wVAHphrCuKl for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852973A6A49 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so339077wag.5 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:39:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=RzvqKzJhVh7u6LGj56YE0mfhKMxXF+jtD2efF0hph0k=; b=A/f8iH3lBwB3I62bN1U3nwLdOSFkOmTnKLu3x8F/A/AtcWD4Cn6vtGwH3Abs42I5NT 37J2btXzSuCrDoIK+o9nFwK1Du0cHn4Lb7J4M0QDo7RpkyfJPOkmpYfo91dlSGUzW/92 NAdbgjgP97qsDcSkFh45CrVHj/EhSE5QWG6Z8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=vCjopIsHG4S03Oklb3Gs1Yd7MxYsf6yY4SkWW2oP0oAyxMqE875+q2rL6LDbmsljZI rsH9NBYzc6dNR1SHvec82OFOK1RQBaZHMDMDrpwuCc8LxzubzH+VdfjE1pYu5CqcP19n dWcrkja5b9YveBMfz1DgYAVklD8nAwh/cQp3A=
Received: by 10.114.102.20 with SMTP id z20mr1696984wab.53.1227224391271; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.57.159.5? ([32.148.158.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a8sm2548987poa.9.2008.11.20.15.39.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:39:50 -0800 (PST)
References: <AB940745-DD14-4089-8407-2F44F6F9FE6E@iformata.com> <4925F1E9.9030802@bogus.com>
Message-Id: <B73BE24A-A607-4639-91B6-335D22D4BDE1@gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <4925F1E9.9030802@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (5F136)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5F136)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:39:35 -0600
Cc: "73attendees@ietf.org" <73attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Kaminsky Bug Options Include "Do Nothing, " Says IETF
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Doing nothing is always an option

The question is not whether doing nothing is an option but what the  
consequences of that option are and if they are acceptable

Sent from my iPhone 3G

On Nov 20, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:

> Pushing dns-sec deployment is not the semantic equivalent of do  
> nothing.
>
> It is perhaps the case that people who haven't played with it are less
> inclined to believe that it's not usable in current form.
>
> joelja
>
> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/20/2130236
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 73attendees mailing list
>> 73attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email