Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Tue, 18 November 2008 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D808E28C24C; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:27:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2603A6B0F; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:03:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JpGU88L7T08T; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A197B28C217; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:03:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.95.196] ([130.129.95.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAIK36X1002158 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:03:07 -0800
Message-ID: <49231F7C.8080602@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:03:08 -0600
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn> <3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net> <20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov> <4922EFDD.6090900@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <4922EFDD.6090900@psg.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/8647/Tue Nov 18 07:09:15 2008 on sbh17.songbird.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:03:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:27:00 -0800
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org


Randy Bush wrote:
> thank you for demonstrating so clearly the jingoistic prejudice at the
> us government level that should preclude ietf being held in the united
> states.


Folks who have read ietf mailing lists for awhile might have noticed that it's 
distinctive when John Klensin and I agree and, therefore, probably worth taking 
as significant.  The joke is old enough to have gotten stale, but it's still true.

However, that's nothing compared with the number of times I agree with Randy.

This is one of them.

Surely there is enough choice in venue to permit a global organization like the 
IETF to select ones that put some effort into being friendly about participation 
by people from a wider set of countries?

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees