IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282F53A6AEE; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:56:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC613A6AEA for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:56:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KYKwqSL5E0VQ for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42803A687E for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8::16:223:12ff:fe56:36b2] ([IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:223:12ff:fe56:36b2]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mAIGtn2i092091 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:55:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <57A45001-885D-4FD9-B461-C07BC671BEFA@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <EB207D30-9428-45E1-B402-7727A4FB4F6D@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:56:33 -0600
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn> <3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net> <20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov> <EB207D30-9428-45E1-B402-7727A4FB4F6D@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On 18 nov 2008, at 10:26, Ted Lemon wrote:

> However unfortunately we have had increasing problems with the U.S.  
> government being skeptical about visa applicants - several good  
> friends of mine have been repeatedly denied entry to the U.S.  
> because the person responsible for admitting them decided that they  
> were at risk of overstaying their visa.   This is new, in the last  
> year, and is the case even though these same people have a track  
> record of /not/ overstaying their visas based on past visits.

Would it be helpful to collect information about these cases and then  
initiate some kind of communication from the IETF towards the US  
authorities?
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email