Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawless in my experience
Richard Johnson <raj@cisco.com> Sat, 22 November 2008 00:57 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206D73A6A6C;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:57:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB783A6A6C
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:57:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id eK+5BhVLBLBG for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:57:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FD33A696A
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:57:13 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,648,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="118021641"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196])
by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2008 00:57:11 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238])
by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAM0vAsG019261
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:57:10 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com
[171.70.151.144])
by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAM0uwTT013101
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:57:10 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by
xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:57:08 -0800
Received: from stealth-10-32-254-179.cisco.com ([10.32.254.179]) by
xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:57:08 -0800
Message-Id: <FE38A13B-C7E0-4C8D-BE30-03792FA3CA9C@cisco.com>
From: Richard Johnson <raj@cisco.com>
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8B6A9EC265011E4CB70F99C64426E8C2028C834526@rrc-dte-exmb2.dte.telcordia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:57:08 -0800
References: <8B6A9EC265011E4CB70F99C64426E8C2028C834526@rrc-dte-exmb2.dte.telcordia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2008 00:57:08.0550 (UTC)
FILETIME=[3EB47660:01C94C3D]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=480; t=1227315431; x=1228179431;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=raj@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Richard=20Johnson=20<raj@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[73attendees]=20The=20wireless=20covera
ge=20was=20flawless=20in=20my=20experience |Sender:=20;
bh=kCjIMfwyo5oc1NnGYcLT3VHVUlDbeyj8Ki3bYsTN12c=;
b=puFe5gaNZRMlToyIGtVGNgiHRihpwQ7MYhixCHhn1e9fESkrDBpem66RjG
bM0fUJGjuOTGOaluBUahhtYQYxRg+8En1Am+v3HIctXvonbwErXBjf9mbpLJ
t2HH4y9ZXz;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=raj@cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Subject: Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawless in my experience
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Yep, not a single problem the entire time. I stayed on the "ietf-a" net figuring it was better in high density environments. It was always there, always worked. /raj On Nov 21, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Haluska, John J wrote: > Thanks for the great network - I did not have a single issue the > entire time. > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawless … Haluska, John J
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Waclawsky John-A52165
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Richard Johnson
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… David B Harrington
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Dan Wing
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- [73attendees] first time in Minneapolis - discove… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Derek Atkins