Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

Phillip Hallam-baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 20 November 2008 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948063A6939; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:46:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F3A3A6939 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:46:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9tdBVi5+vvL for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1263028C198 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so340015wag.5 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :mime-version:subject:date:cc; bh=rMuP6GafG+JF2qwNf3m0z0mZHRLgmpK0sYdampgYjBg=; b=L3tk+54nGztbI61kBuqBrrGScYizXjhkVD9ssNAJCXbLgylxqES07ESJFM6xwFSSxw ohexAT5PIIvrEjtipbZ/vcA8ucvUWxShqVDAGWkZPzHcEqtOHb+jrKnmKhnGxwijL6Le pKrp8NlemtKhkLuORH/lSdlySdK1AKEHVqD2k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc; b=XTAKJ7e84ty9cJ9U/Xm6jcjuQk0gRWkL4N4E/0mKadEZBxiIxIveITe43qfe/W0pEq TSQCl3U2U6QFJeSNP+tgoVEhASZY8ka00lBG327p+EK1a4Glw/W8it7orCquZfiNG0sT NXbN7Wltfg+NsoIk/ennE5VBP/77oE0GXhtuM=
Received: by 10.114.205.1 with SMTP id c1mr1691359wag.128.1227224745742; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.57.159.5? ([32.148.158.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q20sm1807977pog.7.2008.11.20.15.45.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:44 -0800 (PST)
References: <49231473.6070801@psg.com> <C5488031.43684%mshore@cisco.com> <72cfb3d70811181250q61b6fbddvf16f875675b3af8e@mail.gmail.com> <15213246-A9A8-4761-825F-A70201896A80@cisco.com> <4924669B.6080407@dcrocker.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0811191125050.17177@pita.cisco.com> <49249B0D.7020805@dcrocker.net>
Message-Id: <83267C10-05B4-459A-A157-11860FC7A123@gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
In-Reply-To: <49249B0D.7020805@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (5F136)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5F136)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:45:33 -0600
Cc: "73attendees@ietf.org" <73attendees@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Let us ask a different question

In what ways can the ietf act to maximize the information available to  
the embassy in question to enable them to determine that the  
application comes from an active ietf participant?

A letter of invitation to a conference is likely to carry less  
information than a statement that person x has been an active wg  
participant for five years yadda yadda yadda

Sent from my iPhone 3G

On Nov 19, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:

>
>
> Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>> speaking, applicants are NOT refused visas, they just don't get a
>> reply (or a visa) in time and they may never get a reply at all.
>
> The key point is that there was a pattern of failure to get a visa.   
> To me, the remaining details are purely secondary.
>
>
>> We are not sure what happened this time, but we believe the "no  
>> reply" rate was much higher than normal and we will be working with  
>> various
>> parties to try to make this easier in the future.
>
> My concern is with hearing about a pattern of problems over the last  
> several years, for people from a range of countries.  The issue is  
> not specific to this meeting or a single country.
>
> Added to this, of course, is that in the last few years, the U.S.  
> has lost its Most Favored Nation status as a travel destination
>
> No venue will be perfect, but among the complex mix of factors  
> affecting choice of IETF meeting sites, travel hassles that include  
> government bureaucracy and social (dis)favor ought to be included,  
> to the extent that we have evidence they affect attendance.
>
> d/
> -- 
>
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees