Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Phillip Hallam-baker <hallam@gmail.com> Thu, 20 November 2008 23:46 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948063A6939;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:46:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F3A3A6939
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:46:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id j9tdBVi5+vvL for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.183])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1263028C198
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so340015wag.5
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer
:mime-version:subject:date:cc;
bh=rMuP6GafG+JF2qwNf3m0z0mZHRLgmpK0sYdampgYjBg=;
b=L3tk+54nGztbI61kBuqBrrGScYizXjhkVD9ssNAJCXbLgylxqES07ESJFM6xwFSSxw
ohexAT5PIIvrEjtipbZ/vcA8ucvUWxShqVDAGWkZPzHcEqtOHb+jrKnmKhnGxwijL6Le
pKrp8NlemtKhkLuORH/lSdlySdK1AKEHVqD2k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:date:cc;
b=XTAKJ7e84ty9cJ9U/Xm6jcjuQk0gRWkL4N4E/0mKadEZBxiIxIveITe43qfe/W0pEq
TSQCl3U2U6QFJeSNP+tgoVEhASZY8ka00lBG327p+EK1a4Glw/W8it7orCquZfiNG0sT
NXbN7Wltfg+NsoIk/ennE5VBP/77oE0GXhtuM=
Received: by 10.114.205.1 with SMTP id c1mr1691359wag.128.1227224745742;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.57.159.5? ([32.148.158.41])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q20sm1807977pog.7.2008.11.20.15.45.41
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:45:44 -0800 (PST)
References: <49231473.6070801@psg.com> <C5488031.43684%mshore@cisco.com>
<72cfb3d70811181250q61b6fbddvf16f875675b3af8e@mail.gmail.com>
<15213246-A9A8-4761-825F-A70201896A80@cisco.com>
<4924669B.6080407@dcrocker.net>
<Pine.GSO.4.63.0811191125050.17177@pita.cisco.com>
<49249B0D.7020805@dcrocker.net>
Message-Id: <83267C10-05B4-459A-A157-11860FC7A123@gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
In-Reply-To: <49249B0D.7020805@dcrocker.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (5F136)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5F136)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:45:33 -0600
Cc: "73attendees@ietf.org" <73attendees@ietf.org>,
"ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for
2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Let us ask a different question In what ways can the ietf act to maximize the information available to the embassy in question to enable them to determine that the application comes from an active ietf participant? A letter of invitation to a conference is likely to carry less information than a statement that person x has been an active wg participant for five years yadda yadda yadda Sent from my iPhone 3G On Nov 19, 2008, at 5:02 PM, Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote: > > > Ole Jacobsen wrote: >> speaking, applicants are NOT refused visas, they just don't get a >> reply (or a visa) in time and they may never get a reply at all. > > The key point is that there was a pattern of failure to get a visa. > To me, the remaining details are purely secondary. > > >> We are not sure what happened this time, but we believe the "no >> reply" rate was much higher than normal and we will be working with >> various >> parties to try to make this easier in the future. > > My concern is with hearing about a pattern of problems over the last > several years, for people from a range of countries. The issue is > not specific to this meeting or a single country. > > Added to this, of course, is that in the last few years, the U.S. > has lost its Most Favored Nation status as a travel destination > > No venue will be perfect, but among the complex mix of factors > affecting choice of IETF meeting sites, travel hassles that include > government bureaucracy and social (dis)favor ought to be included, > to the extent that we have evidence they affect attendance. > > d/ > -- > > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda