Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Fri, 21 November 2008 17:23 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1A23A68A9;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:23:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5633A68A9
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:23:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id N6-LX6s6mMkl for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:23:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407123A679C
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8::16:223:12ff:fe56:36b2]
([IPv6:2001:df8:0:16:223:12ff:fe56:36b2]) (authenticated bits=0)
by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mALHMiDO086356
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:22:46 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <96152831-7235-446F-91F1-3B660BA431F3@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: <3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:23:31 -0600
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org>
<B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
<3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
<a123a5d60811210913j62a9509fn45004d79472c956d@mail.gmail.com>
<3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
On 21 nov 2008, at 11:17, William Herrin wrote: > Unfortunately, aside from the general instructions on the web site, > they won't tell you. Security through obscurity. ;) Maybe it would be more helpful to complain to the Chinese government, they'll have more incentive to solve this. If the US decides that it doesn't want to let certain people in that is their right, but sitting on requests until it's too late is not good for anyone and I don't consider it an acceptable policy. _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley