IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> Sat, 22 November 2008 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329B93A6A88; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:49:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3912D3A6A86 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:49:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.963
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.963 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.636, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RusuwBAWFX-I for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jackfruit.srv.cs.cmu.edu (JACKFRUIT.SRV.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.201.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F45A3A6A80 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.77.217] ([130.129.77.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by jackfruit.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id mAM3nQ73028085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:49:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:49:26 -0600
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Message-ID: <A53535C01A5B732C215B5CEC@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200811220134.mAM1Ya7b006719@raisinbran.srv.cs.cmu.edu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net> <008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org> <B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com> <20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org> <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk> <3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com> <a123a5d60811210913j62a9509fn45004d79472c956d@mail.gmail.com> <3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com> <96152831-7235-446F-91F1-3B660BA431F3@muada.com> <200811220134.mAM1Ya7b006719@raisinbran.srv.cs.cmu.edu>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanned-By: mimedefang-cmuscs on 128.2.201.16
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

--On Friday, November 21, 2008 05:33:48 PM -0800 Ole Jacobsen 
<ole@cisco.com> wrote:

>
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
>> On 21 nov 2008, at 11:17, William Herrin wrote:
>>
>> > Unfortunately, aside from the general instructions on the web site,
>> > they won't tell you. Security through obscurity. ;)
>>
>> Maybe it would be more helpful to complain to the Chinese government,
>> they'll have more incentive to solve this.
>
> What makes you think this has ANYTHING to do with the Chinese
> government???

The Chinese government, to state the obvious, is the government of Chinese 
citizens.  If Chinese citizens with legitimate business visiting the US are 
having trouble obtaining visas to do so, the US government is (marginally) 
more likely to be receptive to complaints from the Chinese government than 
from individual Chinese citizens.

-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email