Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 21:27 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C53628C255;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:27:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFE93A6A63;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:34:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 5YyJSWA9vBYZ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:34:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net
[217.115.75.234])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDC73A6809;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:34:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56])
by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
mAIKWvVj025556
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:32:57 +0100
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35])
by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
id mAIKWqJe025510; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:32:56 +0100
Received: from demuexc025.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.12]) by
demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:32:53 +0100
Received: from FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.23]) by
demuexc025.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:32:52 +0100
Received: from 10.162.68.129 ([10.162.68.129]) by FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net
([10.159.0.28]) via Exchange Front-End Server
webmail.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.36]) with Microsoft Exchange
Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:27:43 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:27:41 +0200
From: "Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
To: ext Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Yi Zhao <yzhaous@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <C548F1DD.81336%jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
Thread-Topic: [73attendees] Is USA qualified
for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Thread-Index: AclJvBraYXPf7ZWIMEiAt3zm6596kw==
In-Reply-To: <492320C3.6010807@bogus.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2008 20:32:52.0913 (UTC)
FILETIME=[D4C50210:01C949BC]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:27:00 -0800
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified
for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Hi everybody, In the IAOC, we have followed the visa situation for different nations closely. It is obviously in the benefit for the IETF to have all the participants that want and need to come to the IETF could also come. Historically, the IETF community has indicated the preference of having a big part of the meetings in the North American region. This makes us often come to the USA. Traditionally a major part of the participation is from the North American region. Of course, we should periodically check this policy, and also follow the visa situation very carefully. I think it would be good for people that were trying to come to the IETF and couldn't to tell the IAD or me what happened. Accurate data is very important. Cheers, Jonne. On 11/18/08 10:08 PM, "ext Joel Jaeggli" <joelja@bogus.com> wrote: > Yi Zhao wrote: >> Based on my knowledge, for Chinese citizens there is no any problem to >> get the visa to other countries except US. > > I know for a fact that several of your countrymen have had trouble > obtaining visas for other recent IETF destinations. > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *David Quigley >> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 18, 2008 1:56 PM >> *To:* Nicholas Weaver >> *Cc:* 73attendees@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org >> *Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified >> for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? >> >> >> >> Disclaimer: What I say here are my words and don't represent the views >> of my employer. >> >> >> >> From what I see here the issues are mostly experienced by Chinese >> citizens. Most of the other countries have reciprocal visa agreements >> with the US. China however doesn't have that agreement with Ireland, >> Sweden, Japan, or the US. Were there similar problems with gaining >> entrance into Ireland? Will there be similar issues with gaining >> entrance into Sweden or Japan? >> >> >> >> Dave >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Nicholas Weaver >> <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu <mailto:nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>> wrote: >> >> >> On Nov 18, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Scott Brim wrote: >> >> Excerpts from Randy Bush on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 10:39:57AM -0600: >> >> qdang@nist.gov <mailto:qdang@nist.gov> wrote: >> >> I believe our US government would like to grant visas to as many >> people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend a meeting in >> the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can imagine there will >> be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting in CA next year >> alone. >> >> >> thank you for demonstrating so clearly the jingoistic prejudice at the >> us government level that should preclude ietf being held in the united >> states. >> >> >> How would you solve the problem? Let 100 million people in on false >> pretenses? I'm not going to defend the behavior of the US government, >> but I want you to admit that US immigration has a difficult problem. >> Slinging labels around doesn't help. >> >> >> >> Remember, the IETF is NOT special. There are tens of thousands of >> conferences, and they are all pretty much need-to-be-treated equal. If >> the US gave effectively carte blanch to conference attendees, you would >> have no immigration controls, period, as this would be a big enough >> loophole to fly an A380 through. >> >> The Visa issue in the US is serious, but how many people are really >> affected by this? >> >> We need hard data, because the notion of simply "not holding IETF >> meetings in a terrorist country" is not effective. >> >> And if you want to do Visa issues as a criteria, you can strongly argue >> that all IETF meeting SHOULD be in a country where a visa is not >> required for travel for EU, US, Japanese, and Canadian citizens. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 73attendees mailing list >> 73attendees@ietf.org <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 73attendees mailing list >> 73attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Jonne Soininen Nokia Siemens Networks Tel: +358 40 527 46 34 E-mail: jonne.soininen@nsn.com _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda