Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Sat, 22 November 2008 19:06 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F1C3A6978;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:06:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8106B3A6978
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:06:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id tKL0qAI3Xr6s for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:06:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87033A680E
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:06:44 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,650,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="199763603"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21])
by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2008 19:06:43 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238])
by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAMJ6hRN014166;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:06:43 -0800
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199])
by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAMJ6hPL004606;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:06:43 GMT
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:06:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a123a5d60811221053n7b3b4ad6oc4cdc28e37b3ffc7@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0811221105370.8444@pita.cisco.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org>
<B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org> <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
<3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
<a123a5d60811210913j62a9509fn45004d79472c956d@mail.gmail.com>
<3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com>
<96152831-7235-446F-91F1-3B660BA431F3@muada.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.63.0811211732020.18335@pita.cisco.com>
<a123a5d60811221053n7b3b4ad6oc4cdc28e37b3ffc7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=244; t=1227380803; x=1228244803;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com;
z=From:=20Ole=20Jacobsen=20<ole@cisco.com>
|Subject:=20Re=3A=20[73attendees]=20Is=20USA=20qualified=20
for=202.3=20of=0A=20draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection
-criteria? |Sender:=20;
bh=oWxz4+nYwdknTgtecm0EOwdz3PjengwKqhc72l3Gg0U=;
b=NepdYRKMZJdERxwxoYpFCSTNm/om0zCOb9xK7jMW+wIaYCHnw6ou8Qg8PI
i68b0rVPDsl78spDR/liFcBHGd8Ywi+W5m39NQWMgsqP9nE4J/XWoME8u6A6
IuJLu+AXwwDe7QDiURqNRRVPLYhLcHgdfEwV5fQcYExBbNfZYX5TI=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=ole@cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Right, so what can we do to help? Ole On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > The Chinese state dept and the US embassy in China spend much of their time > discussing precisely this sort of issue. That is their job. > _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley