Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"Mike McBride (mmcbride)" <mmcbride@cisco.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 17:09 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616843A6AFE;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:09:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5E73A6808
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:09:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id CFVlQ4eC7NpF for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:09:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AF828C1E2
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:09:29 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,626,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="196994928"
Received: from sj-dkim-3.cisco.com ([171.71.179.195])
by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2008 17:09:29 +0000
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254])
by sj-dkim-3.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mAIH9TFI028913;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:09:29 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com
[171.70.151.144])
by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mAIH9T5K011761;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:09:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-219.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.188]) by
xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:09:28 -0800
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:09:27 -0800
Message-ID: <47951CBFA6409B4C8916514FCB05BFBE0543EFEA@xmb-sjc-219.amer.cisco.com>
In-reply-to: <57A45001-885D-4FD9-B461-C07BC671BEFA@muada.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [73attendees] Is USA
qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Thread-Index: AclJnqxpmIZiqC/AQgSwxEQ16O1NPgAAME9Q
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn><3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net><20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov><EB207D30-9428-45E1-B402-7727A4FB4F6D@fugue.com>
<57A45001-885D-4FD9-B461-C07BC671BEFA@muada.com>
From: "Mike McBride (mmcbride)" <mmcbride@cisco.com>
To: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@muada.com>, "Ted Lemon" <mellon@fugue.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2008 17:09:28.0945 (UTC)
FILETIME=[6AA34610:01C949A0]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=369; t=1227028169; x=1227892169;
c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=mmcbride@cisco.com;
z=From:=20=22Mike=20McBride=20(mmcbride)=22=20<mmcbride@cisc
o.com>
|Subject:=20RE=3A=20[73attendees]=20Is=20USA=20qualifiedfor
=092.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
|Sender:=20; bh=SOLgstaq/91O8WAgw3fjpFaS9iWOituS0fpEfnhdhZM=;
b=tfUeZNEZxWzrOLS2/Ckb3MA6yoQdTn6NHH3yfUQ8fq66KVMiED/89kvTLm
VElaN2Kv0Re3j6KFJ6mF/KgXWQfCZtJmTApOvau96sZ6UcO4stS3ELYwh52X
UbVhhMRILx;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=mmcbride@cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; );
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA
qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
> > However unfortunately we have had increasing problems with > the U.S. > > government being skeptical about visa applicants - several good I, for one, I'm grateful the U.S. is a pain in the visa arse. In behalf of my country, sorry for the headaches, but I think its fair to be a bit skeptical after 9/11. More Canada mtgs sounds great. mike _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda