IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Sat, 22 November 2008 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100383A6AAB; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054793A6AAB for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JijmgCwRB8-j for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1123D3A680E for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1121828fga.41 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=DdCyNMdGbo5mS+Z6mfEHZqc4YzA1tHlo7Jn9Xix2odY=; b=vAVkR2vLuY6ogZewjzWNPvLy2NxyzUpADd0U3AGDhDj64BxsII/e9fdhlhmHEZny8r QH4WUR8hfa4tcNmUsd0hPJXo7sWEBV/ala5ZLcSO3Ll2gK0OOx1Kc68zotEm7hsNCPey /+CJGpyawIh2NJMsnuZYAbLf4i2cBhcN16D4M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=aAs9X2ztDWAGA0GktytObk7APrxhVI66El2w/OrGi9SKh5BNqQ/AehsBbGto4rnQKw qh0NruYUmrMrBAG8nXWdULrQIcmTdkChd9fl7m/sNDnI8iOcfc+cXR4t3NngbcMRmuD7 XbN/TN4Gm1dZeZ48ArLNl3nUtU6j6EZB0ppIE=
Received: by 10.180.245.15 with SMTP id s15mr505771bkh.169.1227381003177; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.153.1 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60811221110k5407b538g3bdf163049a3fd38@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:10:03 -0500
From: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: <3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net> <008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org> <B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com> <20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org> <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk> <3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com> <a123a5d60811210913j62a9509fn45004d79472c956d@mail.gmail.com> <3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1647366330=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Have you tried, or is this just an assumption you are making?

Folk told me I was wasting my time when I proposed a White House Web site in
1992. If you make the right argument people usually do the right thing.

The argument I would make to state here is that if we can show that the
person who is applying for the visa has been contributing to the work of the
IETF for an extended time, there really is very little risk of them
overstaying their visa. People who might qualify for an H1B are unlikely to
risk their chances of obtaining one legitimately.

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:17 PM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > How about we deputize someone to go ask State what the best way to
> maximize
> > the probability of a prompt acceptance is?
>
> Phillip-
>
> Unfortunately, aside from the general instructions on the web site,
> they won't tell you. Security through obscurity. ;)
>
> -Bill
>
>
>
> --
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com  bill@herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
>



-- 
Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime
http://dotcrimemanifesto.com

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email