Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 19:39 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42C63A6B0C;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:39:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D636C3A6B0C;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:39:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=2.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_INVITATION=-2,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id YU7Gppa2cg5v; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:39:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEAB3A67F4;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:39:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29])
by mail-out3.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C62D4562425;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:38:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay13.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by relay13.apple.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id
7A985280FC; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:38:59 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 1180711d-aaa98bb000000ef0-6d-492319d29d63
Received: from [17.151.111.7] (unknown [17.151.111.7])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id EBC91280D0;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:38:58 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
To: YAO <healthyao@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
X-Priority: 3
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
<20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org>
<B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
Message-Id: <08023B46-98D8-4DBC-90BF-EC8A78D36B76@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:38:57 -0600
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
On Nov 18, 2008, at 00:24, YAO wrote: > > It seems that many IETFer are disallowed to enter USA for ietf > meeting when ietf is held in USA this time or other times Has anyone been denied entry to the USA for IETF 73, without official explanation, despite their including an IETF invitation with their timely visa application to U.S. authorities? If so, then that might be something worth investigating. -- james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> member of technical staff, communications engineering _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley