Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"YAO Jiankang" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Wed, 19 November 2008 01:09 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D8C3A69B1;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:09:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C52C3A69B1
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:09:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <tnbhQkqHIFa9>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Duplicate header field: "Message-ID"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_BLANKS=0.041,
MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id tnbhQkqHIFa9 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:09:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C03083A68E8
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:09:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (eyou send program); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:09:15 +0800
Message-ID: <427056955.11808@cnnic.cn>
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yaojk@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown (HELO yaojk) (218.241.111.35)
by 159.226.7.146 with SMTP; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:09:15 +0800
Message-ID: <059201c949e3$6de492f0$236ff1da@yaojk>
From: "YAO Jiankang" <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: "Nicholas Weaver" <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>,
"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
References: <492320C3.6010807@bogus.com><C548F1DD.81336%jonne.soininen@nsn.com><45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A660206A5DA9A@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
<427045891.00697@cnnic.cn>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:09:10 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Cc: "Soininen Jonne \(NSN FI/Espoo\)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>,
Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>, ietf@ietf.org,
73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is
USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicholas Weaver" <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com> Cc: "Nicholas Weaver" <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>DU>; <ietf@ietf.org>rg>; "Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>om>; <73attendees@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 6:04 AM Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? > > On Nov 18, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Livingood, Jason wrote: > >> I recall stats from IETF 71 (which may be out of date). I believe at >> that time, 48% of attendees were from the U.S. Next was Japan with >> 9%, >> then China with 5.7%. If I recall correctly, this was a good number >> of >> attendees from China, but I do not know how that compared to IETF 72 >> or >> to IETF 73. Is the visa issue for visitors from all countries >> coming to >> the U.S., or is this specific to Chinese citizens coming to the U.S. >> >> Jason > > The US offers a large number in the Visa Waiver program: > http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html > > Which is basically EU + Japan + australia, yes, sure. all these countries are developed countries. IETFers from developing countries are not easy to get a visa to USA. > > Plus Canada under a different category. > > I would bet (but have no evidence) that the visa problem is almost > specifically a chinese issue. > > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda