Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Mon, 24 November 2008 18:09 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5343A6A1A;
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:09:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57FE3A697A
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:08:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Czzj0556d5pM for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717DB3A6A1A
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:08:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1734947fga.41
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:08:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=qXDqGCZMoDi0Do8Ok2DOvgpsPaggkAbQaVQUm7Q+KrE=;
b=PmwHOmAyYw0dwLQqxYX/dz+XUCMIIUIW4UZiSkLsgEptR2BjhnJ6nPedViYACBixFw
Ig5L11PwCKiMjfN7aCAx42tEGpY7mN4xjencbJNjyB27nhjegQhpoX0LdYkJfM4ErCcZ
ce4ZviioK5agnJiihtY7Aw1kCaEBHK0rhOZFU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=JJZjjwg2oWQwuKBv4L9//uVjl8QksFXu0OZM6uFbsQPoBDm0LTB7EkuD9kbj6j9w4F
KuYX6x/X7PJ6skW0uujduMqEoFVWfYgzd/nyFr8qAne1bta0U9jxV+vvEc1/QQ36DqiL
MiG479YVBdjfHrXKrCBiH4GIQ+1yH6h6rnzv8=
Received: by 10.181.215.9 with SMTP id s9mr1201454bkq.212.1227550133858;
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.153.1 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60811241008r5b716e58oeec8c01d10555ea5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:08:53 -0500
From: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "Derek Atkins" <warlord@pgp.com>
In-Reply-To: <49281499.8040604@pgp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
<3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
<a123a5d60811210913j62a9509fn45004d79472c956d@mail.gmail.com>
<3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com>
<96152831-7235-446F-91F1-3B660BA431F3@muada.com>
<200811220134.mAM1Ya7b006719@raisinbran.srv.cs.cmu.edu>
<A53535C01A5B732C215B5CEC@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
<49281499.8040604@pgp.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1831681328=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Your House member's staff certainly would be. Yours in particular is likely to be considering running for the Senate On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Derek Atkins <warlord@pgp.com> wrote: > Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > > --On Friday, November 21, 2008 05:33:48 PM -0800 Ole Jacobsen > > <ole@cisco.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > >> > >>> On 21 nov 2008, at 11:17, William Herrin wrote: > >>> > >>> > Unfortunately, aside from the general instructions on the web site, > >>> > they won't tell you. Security through obscurity. ;) > >>> > >>> Maybe it would be more helpful to complain to the Chinese government, > >>> they'll have more incentive to solve this. > >> > >> What makes you think this has ANYTHING to do with the Chinese > >> government??? > > > > The Chinese government, to state the obvious, is the government of > > Chinese citizens. If Chinese citizens with legitimate business visiting > > the US are having trouble obtaining visas to do so, the US government is > > (marginally) more likely to be receptive to complaints from the Chinese > > government than from individual Chinese citizens. > > Ahh, but would they (the US Govt) be receptive to complaints from US > Citizens? > > > -- Jeff > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins > Principal Software Engineer > > PGP Corporation > 4 Farragut Ave > Somerville, MA 02144 > > +1 617 623 3745 | warlord@pgp.com > > PGP Corporation -- Rest Secured.(TM) > > PGP Fingerprint: > 0FEE 5EA1 FF22 E0C9 4FFE > 631A 9232 FF93 1C80 1DB7 > > This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, > confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended > recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any > attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not > the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and > permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any > attachments thereto. > > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > -- Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime http://dotcrimemanifesto.com
_______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley