IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Fri, 21 November 2008 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47243A6A3F; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:10:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5943A6A0B for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:10:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zq4Hms6Ri6QV for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:10:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nylon.softarmor.com (nylon.softarmor.com [66.135.38.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD92C3A6A3F for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.95.115] ([130.129.95.115]) (authenticated bits=0) by nylon.softarmor.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mALJATMj032145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:10:31 -0600
Message-Id: <5D4C69A4-2CCF-48C6-A8E2-949BF0E38A4F@softarmor.com>
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <40FB0FFB97588246A1BEFB05759DC8A00261B72C@S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:10:23 -0600
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net><008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer><20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org><B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com><20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org><046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk><3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com><DC5BB921-5538-4BAE-B433-43C10EEAE80E@nokia.com><4926070E.1080900@krsek.cz> <D660D11E35739B42A5DF6103C95C63CC0347172D@S4DE9JSAANL.ost.t-com.de> <40FB0FFB97588246A1BEFB05759DC8A00261B72C@S4DE9JSAANI.ost.t-com.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

>
>> As a nethead, I am deeply opposed to the idea of a "carrier-grade"
>> IETF ship.  But if you call it a "large-scale ocean-based meeting
>> venue", then it's fine of course.

Perhaps we could talk to the US government about renting the  
"Enterprise". That couldn't possibly be carrier-grade, could it?

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/cvn-65.htm

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email