Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

"David Quigley" <quigleystravels@gmail.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED14628C115; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810FB28C13D for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EG7VAB6ojyx1 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350DB3A69CF for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1713027ywj.49 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=WRbc3cFH8n8kNOJciuFx/YvasmrU+LVaRr3lLbdftlo=; b=BMnkDiSXRTz3+kaGhhIjBitl0s8XCruaQCTcUeiKtWPISFhuZVcRVxkHWhF562by5u 55AAW/3mghzhvgAaEoKJQe4kqgat/mjP8mvOTgO7gkE7oLfiZQphF4uGUcc4N7mE8joo 0rFysawK2ZMyiCd4VRH4Y2sO8aVk50OmbEvoI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=QRt3yJf7EzFjDeoY4nx2Le93KDdnZaQF93xYW9j6zI/s1kve2A8/+pMzzg6sT6kMYe CQQpLvktM1YEq9rkLL5qqBMc4aMrqXieN8DRZrLegF98g7HE/qiYH3BTmsDKjRLoHqra HG9n3zyg1wFOOq3juGtpOzGQqMqQVRZZk6ED0=
Received: by 10.142.222.21 with SMTP id u21mr110231wfg.15.1227038178719; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.173.16 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <678210550811181156y64097694n83b061be9cbcc6b9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:56:18 -0600
From: "David Quigley" <quigleystravels@gmail.com>
To: "Nicholas Weaver" <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <F9EC68B6-AB00-4502-A48F-2695559EFBB2@icsi.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn> <3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net> <20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov> <4922EFDD.6090900@psg.com> <20081118165343.GA8992@cisco.com> <F9EC68B6-AB00-4502-A48F-2695559EFBB2@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0945616649=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

Disclaimer: What I say here are my words and don't represent the views of my
employer.

>From what I see here the issues are mostly experienced by Chinese citizens.
Most of the other countries have reciprocal visa agreements with the US.
China however doesn't have that agreement with Ireland, Sweden, Japan, or
the US. Were there similar problems with gaining entrance into Ireland? Will
there be similar issues with gaining entrance into Sweden or Japan?

Dave

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Nicholas Weaver
<nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>wrote;wrote:

>
> On Nov 18, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
>
>  Excerpts from Randy Bush on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 10:39:57AM -0600:
>>
>>> qdang@nist.gov wrote:
>>>
>>>> I believe our US government would like to grant visas to as many
>>>> people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend a meeting in
>>>> the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can imagine there will
>>>> be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting in CA next year
>>>> alone.
>>>>
>>>
>>> thank you for demonstrating so clearly the jingoistic prejudice at the
>>> us government level that should preclude ietf being held in the united
>>> states.
>>>
>>
>> How would you solve the problem?  Let 100 million people in on false
>> pretenses?  I'm not going to defend the behavior of the US government,
>> but I want you to admit that US immigration has a difficult problem.
>> Slinging labels around doesn't help.
>>
>
> Remember, the IETF is NOT special.  There are tens of thousands of
> conferences, and they are all pretty much need-to-be-treated equal.  If the
> US gave effectively carte blanch to conference attendees, you would have no
> immigration controls, period, as this would be a big enough loophole to fly
> an A380 through.
>
> The Visa issue in the US is serious, but how many people are really
> affected by this?
>
> We need hard data, because the notion of simply "not holding IETF meetings
> in a terrorist country" is not effective.
>
> And if you want to do Visa issues as a criteria, you can strongly argue
> that all IETF meeting SHOULD be in a country where a visa is not required
> for travel for EU, US, Japanese, and Canadian citizens.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>
_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees