Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"David Quigley" <quigleystravels@gmail.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 19:56 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED14628C115;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810FB28C13D
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id EG7VAB6ojyx1 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350DB3A69CF
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1713027ywj.49
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=WRbc3cFH8n8kNOJciuFx/YvasmrU+LVaRr3lLbdftlo=;
b=BMnkDiSXRTz3+kaGhhIjBitl0s8XCruaQCTcUeiKtWPISFhuZVcRVxkHWhF562by5u
55AAW/3mghzhvgAaEoKJQe4kqgat/mjP8mvOTgO7gkE7oLfiZQphF4uGUcc4N7mE8joo
0rFysawK2ZMyiCd4VRH4Y2sO8aVk50OmbEvoI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=QRt3yJf7EzFjDeoY4nx2Le93KDdnZaQF93xYW9j6zI/s1kve2A8/+pMzzg6sT6kMYe
CQQpLvktM1YEq9rkLL5qqBMc4aMrqXieN8DRZrLegF98g7HE/qiYH3BTmsDKjRLoHqra
HG9n3zyg1wFOOq3juGtpOzGQqMqQVRZZk6ED0=
Received: by 10.142.222.21 with SMTP id u21mr110231wfg.15.1227038178719;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.173.16 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <678210550811181156y64097694n83b061be9cbcc6b9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:56:18 -0600
From: "David Quigley" <quigleystravels@gmail.com>
To: "Nicholas Weaver" <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <F9EC68B6-AB00-4502-A48F-2695559EFBB2@icsi.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn>
<3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net>
<20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov>
<4922EFDD.6090900@psg.com> <20081118165343.GA8992@cisco.com>
<F9EC68B6-AB00-4502-A48F-2695559EFBB2@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for
2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0945616649=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Disclaimer: What I say here are my words and don't represent the views of my employer. >From what I see here the issues are mostly experienced by Chinese citizens. Most of the other countries have reciprocal visa agreements with the US. China however doesn't have that agreement with Ireland, Sweden, Japan, or the US. Were there similar problems with gaining entrance into Ireland? Will there be similar issues with gaining entrance into Sweden or Japan? Dave On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>wrote;wrote: > > On Nov 18, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Scott Brim wrote: > > Excerpts from Randy Bush on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 10:39:57AM -0600: >> >>> qdang@nist.gov wrote: >>> >>>> I believe our US government would like to grant visas to as many >>>> people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend a meeting in >>>> the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can imagine there will >>>> be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting in CA next year >>>> alone. >>>> >>> >>> thank you for demonstrating so clearly the jingoistic prejudice at the >>> us government level that should preclude ietf being held in the united >>> states. >>> >> >> How would you solve the problem? Let 100 million people in on false >> pretenses? I'm not going to defend the behavior of the US government, >> but I want you to admit that US immigration has a difficult problem. >> Slinging labels around doesn't help. >> > > Remember, the IETF is NOT special. There are tens of thousands of > conferences, and they are all pretty much need-to-be-treated equal. If the > US gave effectively carte blanch to conference attendees, you would have no > immigration controls, period, as this would be a big enough loophole to fly > an A380 through. > > The Visa issue in the US is serious, but how many people are really > affected by this? > > We need hard data, because the notion of simply "not holding IETF meetings > in a terrorist country" is not effective. > > And if you want to do Visa issues as a criteria, you can strongly argue > that all IETF meeting SHOULD be in a country where a visa is not required > for travel for EU, US, Japanese, and Canadian citizens. > > > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees >
_______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda