Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 17:46 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=LbTUkeI9wx9Na+yevZX0a7sudHz6PSuN+2Yua1T6g3mbKcrdvtlpurXUv0HYeBRzfP VlOJ0zeO5jsPREM420wfjgxMP7Eqzidl9dTHryD5C7W2w+8K6y1tdhmrEgoIRv1TNgax Qiu2Q0fVe3rO40YjKY/Tz5oB4OvnLvO5QINLE=
Message-ID: <a123a5d60811180946k71b8703flc4056f90350ef6fd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:46:40 -0600
From: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com>
To: YAO <healthyao@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net> <008601c944fd$950335c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <20081113165601.GA2969@gsp.org> <B81943909B5DD6BFD3A486B3@p3.int.jck.com> <20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org> <046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Precedence: list
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1310523805=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

No good can come of this thread.

How about we wait a few months and see what happens after the fourth branch
of government becomes part of the executive branch again on Jan 20th?

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:24 AM, YAO <healthyao@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> according to IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04#section-2.3
>
> which said "
>
> 2.3.  Freedom of Participation
>
>   Meetings should not be held in countries where some attendees could
>   be disallowed entry or where freedom of speech is not guaranteed for
>   all participants.
> "
>
> My question is :"
>
> Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
> draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria as IETF Meeting Venue ?"
>
> It seems that many IETFer are disallowed to enter USA for ietf meeting when
> ietf is held in USA this time or other times
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>



-- 
Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime
http://dotcrimemanifesto.com

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

[73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley