Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ?
Massimiliano Pala <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.edu> Tue, 18 November 2008 21:27 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB2F28C17E;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:27:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C6E3A67F4
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:33:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.069,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id bFrVv7HaWHbi for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:33:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.dartmouth.edu (mail.cs.dartmouth.edu [129.170.212.100])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FEB3A677C
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from titan.cs.dartmouth.edu ([130.129.78.202]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.cs.dartmouth.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mAIIXLDf014493
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:33:21 -0500
Message-ID: <492261CA.4040009@Dartmouth.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:33:46 -0600
From: Massimiliano Pala <Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.edu>
Organization: Dartmouth College - Computer Science Department
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn><3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net><20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov><EB207D30-9428-45E1-B402-7727A4FB4F6D@fugue.com>
<57A45001-885D-4FD9-B461-C07BC671BEFA@muada.com>
<47951CBFA6409B4C8916514FCB05BFBE0543EFEA@xmb-sjc-219.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <47951CBFA6409B4C8916514FCB05BFBE0543EFEA@xmb-sjc-219.amer.cisco.com>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:27:00 -0800
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1119076267=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Hello, I am sorry to say this mike, but hiding every problem behind the fear of 9/11 is not wise and nor fair. Security can be achieved in many ways and denying a piece of paper is not one of those, IMHO. The issue of Visas for the IETF is serious, and definitely it should be addressed. There are many people that could help in this as they are involved with the US authorities - I hope that they will be willing to help. Personally I support the idea of having more meetings in Canada (or better would be south-america - e.g., Argentina - during the winter :D) Cheers, Mike McBride (mmcbride) wrote: > I, for one, I'm grateful the U.S. is a pain in the visa arse. In behalf > of my country, sorry for the headaches, but I think its fair to be a bit > skeptical after 9/11. More Canada mtgs sounds great. -- Best Regards, Massimiliano Pala --o------------------------------------------------------------------------ Massimiliano Pala [OpenCA Project Manager] Massimiliano.Pala@dartmouth.edu project.manager@openca.org Dartmouth Computer Science Dept Home Phone: +1 (603) 369-9332 PKI/Trust Laboratory Work Phone: +1 (603) 646-9179 --o------------------------------------------------------------------------ People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -- Isaac Asimov
_______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda