Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Sat, 22 November 2008 19:02 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F03A6AA4;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:02:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8D33A6AA4
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:02:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 1dZfKUVdJg1F for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:02:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A1B3A698F
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1120155fga.41
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:02:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=m2etppIN5o3duJJoXNFEC1BPFHckdq8/eTyT2x1nLYg=;
b=XlJMEQikZYmHHVhjR9rlsQOgUqHXMBjEUtDN4311w033z6f7IOjt8o5YtNYSJwNPwo
cyXyyG3IALT7Zi++nmYDuOolX5o2AO4p0Rh4TxUtG2JOdA4wQfqHCi97cTprz0H06ncu
PWGgplR0Jt7aQuzN+s6Kltw2O6QQJlEH68k0s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=STOe62OHv+x2v6U30F0SEXPisHG84A8ih/lAvLtLc7X1QQAdgSYpzs9K44tvW19W0R
NAS/0iY2DWxFnobQWjWVEcK/wGf259EQxhCtkLskqJaKGGss41ODbPsdqOZMePKN0CBE
dPInE7vxI+osr9uyMvkuQtpIrFvv0v0QAcVTM=
Received: by 10.181.202.12 with SMTP id e12mr507285bkq.138.1227380566798;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:02:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.153.1 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:02:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60811221102y48e9b6d3l705d79a0064b29ad@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:02:46 -0500
From: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <001d01c94cd3$03a0a580$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <61968779B8AC4C4BAB421D4C12F008C015FE9BBF@XCH47YKF.rim.net>
<a123a5d60811211450q3832224dv3f0c80fb80de39ff@mail.gmail.com>
<001d01c94cd3$03a0a580$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for
2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0089008515=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
No And there would be the new risk of piracy. On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, David B Harrington < dbharrington@comcast.net> wrote: > Would it solve the problem if we had the IETF buy its own ships, declare > independence from all countries, and establish its own embassies from which > to secure visas? > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] > *On Behalf Of *Phillip Hallam-Baker > *Sent:* Friday, November 21, 2008 4:50 PM > *To:* Andrew Allen > *Cc:* 73attendees@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for > 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? > > Why build one? We could have picked up the Queen's old ship a short while > ago. > > Don't see how it is going to solve the visa problem though, not unless it > is big enough to land a passenger jet on. > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Andrew Allen <aallen@rim.com> wrote: > >> >> The SS Jon Postel? >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org> >> Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org <73attendees@ietf.org> >> Sent: Thu Nov 20 19:55:42 2008 >> Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of >> draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? >> >> >> >> >> >> Is this thread still going? Heck, just hold it on a boat. Change the >> >> IETF conference into an IETF cruise in international waters. >> >> >> > >> > Just to be clear, unless the boat is an aircraft carrier, people will >> > still need a visa to fly to where the ship is docked. >> > >> >> Lets raise domain registrations to $100 per domain per year (not a big >> deal for domain owners) and spend 85% of amount at Grumman Naval systems >> (or another neat company) to build a nice carrier for community? I also >> have several proposed names for the civil carrier. >> >> Having satellite uplinks, we can also run one completelly independent >> copy of root nameservers. >> >> MK >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 73attendees mailing list >> 73attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential >> information, privileged material (including material protected by the >> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public >> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended >> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, >> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your >> system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this >> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. >> _______________________________________________ >> 73attendees mailing list >> 73attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees >> > > > > -- > Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime > http://dotcrimemanifesto.com > > -- Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime http://dotcrimemanifesto.com
_______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of draf… Andrew Allen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of draf… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David B Harrington
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Tony Li
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… John C Klensin