Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 22:05 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C30C28C27F;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:05:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A1928C27F;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:05:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id KyGTa96cDkT8; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC4328C279;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:05:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ilexp02.ndc.lucent.com (h135-3-39-2.lucent.com [135.3.39.2])
by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id mAIM4aZp010531;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:05:02 -0600 (CST)
Received: from DEEXP01.de.lucent.com ([135.248.187.65]) by
ilexp02.ndc.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:04:47 -0600
Received: from DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com ([135.248.187.28]) by
DEEXP01.de.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:04:45 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:04:43 +0100
Message-ID: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE29180024D97BE@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A660206A5DA9A@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [73attendees] Is
USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Thread-Index: AclJvBraYXPf7ZWIMEiAt3zm6596kwABExQQAAIg5wA=
References: <492320C3.6010807@bogus.com><C548F1DD.81336%jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
<45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A660206A5DA9A@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com>
From: "DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>,
"Soininen Jonne \(NSN FI/Espoo\)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>,
"ext Joel Jaeggli" <joelja@bogus.com>, "Yi Zhao" <yzhaous@huawei.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2008 22:04:45.0426 (UTC)
FILETIME=[AA7BBD20:01C949C9]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is
USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
You can find document statistics here which detail where the authors of our life and blood come from: http://www.arkko.com/tools/docstats Take a look at the one for authors of current drafts here: http://www.arkko.com/tools/stats/d-countryeudistr.html Could not find the meeting participation statistics, although I am sure they are lurking somewhere. regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Livingood, Jason > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:56 PM > To: Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo); ext Joel Jaeggli; Yi Zhao > Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is > USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? > > I recall stats from IETF 71 (which may be out of date). I > believe at that time, 48% of attendees were from the U.S. > Next was Japan with 9%, then China with 5.7%. If I recall > correctly, this was a good number of attendees from China, > but I do not know how that compared to IETF 72 or to IETF 73. > Is the visa issue for visitors from all countries coming to > the U.S., or is this specific to Chinese citizens coming to the U.S. > > Jason > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] > On Behalf > > Of Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo) > > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 3:28 PM > > To: ext Joel Jaeggli; Yi Zhao > > Cc: 'David Quigley'; 73attendees@ietf.org; 'Nicholas Weaver'; > > ietf@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA > > qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > In the IAOC, we have followed the visa situation for > different nations > > closely. It is obviously in the benefit for the IETF to > have all the > > participants that want and need to come to the IETF could also come. > > > > Historically, the IETF community has indicated the preference of > > having a big part of the meetings in the North American > region. This > > makes us often come to the USA. Traditionally a major part of the > > participation is from the North American region. > > > > Of course, we should periodically check this policy, and > also follow > > the visa situation very carefully. > > > > I think it would be good for people that were trying to come to the > > IETF and couldn't to tell the IAD or me what happened. > > Accurate data is very important. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jonne. > > > > > > > > > > On 11/18/08 10:08 PM, "ext Joel Jaeggli" <joelja@bogus.com> wrote: > > > > > Yi Zhao wrote: > > >> Based on my knowledge, for Chinese citizens there is no > > any problem > > >> to get the visa to other countries except US. > > > > > > I know for a fact that several of your countrymen have > had trouble > > > obtaining visas for other recent IETF destinations. > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> --- > > >> > > >> *From:* 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org > > >> [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of > *David Quigley > > >> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 18, 2008 1:56 PM > > >> *To:* Nicholas Weaver > > >> *Cc:* 73attendees@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > > >> *Subject:* Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified > > >> for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Disclaimer: What I say here are my words and don't represent the > > >> views of my employer. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> From what I see here the issues are mostly experienced > by Chinese > > >> citizens. Most of the other countries have reciprocal visa > > agreements > > >> with the US. China however doesn't have that agreement > > with Ireland, > > >> Sweden, Japan, or the US. Were there similar problems > with gaining > > >> entrance into Ireland? Will there be similar issues with gaining > > >> entrance into Sweden or Japan? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Dave > > >> > > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Nicholas Weaver > > >> <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu > > <mailto:nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu>> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> On Nov 18, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Scott Brim wrote: > > >> > > >> Excerpts from Randy Bush on Tue, Nov 18, 2008 > 10:39:57AM -0600: > > >> > > >> qdang@nist.gov <mailto:qdang@nist.gov> wrote: > > >> > > >> I believe our US government would like to grant visas > > to as many > > >> people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend > > a meeting in > > >> the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can > > imagine there will > > >> be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting > > in CA next year > > >> alone. > > >> > > >> > > >> thank you for demonstrating so clearly the jingoistic > > prejudice at the > > >> us government level that should preclude ietf being > > held in the united > > >> states. > > >> > > >> > > >> How would you solve the problem? Let 100 million > > people in on false > > >> pretenses? I'm not going to defend the behavior of > > the US government, > > >> but I want you to admit that US immigration has a > > difficult problem. > > >> Slinging labels around doesn't help. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Remember, the IETF is NOT special. There are tens of > thousands of > > >> conferences, and they are all pretty much > > need-to-be-treated equal. > > >> If the US gave effectively carte blanch to conference > > attendees, you > > >> would have no immigration controls, period, as this > would be a big > > >> enough loophole to fly an A380 through. > > >> > > >> The Visa issue in the US is serious, but how many people > > are really > > >> affected by this? > > >> > > >> We need hard data, because the notion of simply "not > holding IETF > > >> meetings in a terrorist country" is not effective. > > >> > > >> And if you want to do Visa issues as a criteria, you can > strongly > > >> argue that all IETF meeting SHOULD be in a country where > a visa is > > >> not required for travel for EU, US, Japanese, and Canadian > > citizens. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> 73attendees mailing list > > >> 73attendees@ietf.org <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org> > > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> --- > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> 73attendees mailing list > > >> 73attendees@ietf.org > > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Ietf mailing list > > > Ietf@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > > -- > > Jonne Soininen > > Nokia Siemens Networks > > > > Tel: +358 40 527 46 34 > > E-mail: jonne.soininen@nsn.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda