Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"Andrew Allen" <aallen@rim.com> Fri, 21 November 2008 01:16 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9913A69D8;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:16:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715DB3A69D8
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:16:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id gahQjanO-xnB for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mhs04ykf.rim.net (mhs04ykf.rim.net [216.9.243.82])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EE53A6873
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mhs04ykf.rim.net (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mhs04ykf.rim.net (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id
F33935CED9; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:16:00 -0500 (EST)
X-AuditID: 0a666446-a6a2fbb000002774-0a-49260bd03ed2
Received: from XCH20YKF.rim.net (unknown [10.102.100.35])
by mhs04ykf.rim.net (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id CE69C5CED7;
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:16:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from XCH47YKF.rim.net ([10.64.31.217]) by XCH20YKF.rim.net with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:16:00 -0500
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:16:00 -0500
Message-ID: <61968779B8AC4C4BAB421D4C12F008C015FE9BBF@XCH47YKF.rim.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for
2.3of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Thread-Index: AclLdCN9lxu+PT1yR/SpkaNPt1mdngAApNPL
From: "Andrew Allen" <aallen@rim.com>
To: <michal@krsek.cz>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2008 01:16:00.0683 (UTC)
FILETIME=[B7187FB0:01C94B76]
X-Tracking: l78g3a020ZlaY23Ui5aE4K8Rfo224k89V5c
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for
2.3of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
The SS Jon Postel? ----- Original Message ----- From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org> Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org <73attendees@ietf.org> Sent: Thu Nov 20 19:55:42 2008 Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? >> >> Is this thread still going? Heck, just hold it on a boat. Change the >> IETF conference into an IETF cruise in international waters. >> > > Just to be clear, unless the boat is an aircraft carrier, people will > still need a visa to fly to where the ship is docked. > Lets raise domain registrations to $100 per domain per year (not a big deal for domain owners) and spend 85% of amount at Grumman Naval systems (or another neat company) to build a nice carrier for community? I also have several proposed names for the civil carrier. Having satellite uplinks, we can also run one completelly independent copy of root nameservers. MK _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of draf… Andrew Allen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of draf… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David B Harrington
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Tony Li
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… John C Klensin