Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ?
Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Wed, 19 November 2008 09:19 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD25D3A67F5;
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:19:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039253A67F5
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:19:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451,
HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1,
RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id KESudMxiwZb3 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net (unknown [201.216.232.80])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306E53A67D0
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:19:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56])
by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186526B6C1F;
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:19:31 -0300 (ART)
Received: from notebook.gont.com.ar (c-75-72-21-38.hsd1.mn.comcast.net
[75.72.21.38]) (authenticated bits=0)
by venus.xmundo.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id mAJ9JNHT004149;
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:19:25 -0200
Message-Id: <200811190919.mAJ9JNHT004149@venus.xmundo.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:13:23 -0300
To: =?gb2312?B?1cW5+se/?= <zhangguoqiang@cnnic.cn>,
Massimiliano.Pala@Dartmouth.edu, 73attendees@ietf.org
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <427048259.23931@cnnic.cn>
References: <427048259.23931@cnnic.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by
milter-greylist-3.0 (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]);
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:19:30 -0300 (ART)
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
At 07:44 p.m. 18/11/2008, =?gb2312?B?1cW5+se/?= wrote: >south-east Asia and Australia can also be potential candidates. South America >seems too far for Asia and European participants. Guess what: Asia and Europe are too far (not to mention *expensive*) for south-american participants. (not to mention that will not help to get more south-american aprticipants involved in the IETF) Kind regards, Fernando Gont (south-american participant) -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? YAO Jiankang