Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawless in my experience
"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Fri, 21 November 2008 20:44 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64F43A6977;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:44:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B233A6977
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:44:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id j8ZK6D5-Bv0G for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:44:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9383D3A68B9
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:44:00 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,645,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="26468792"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138])
by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2008 20:43:58 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150])
by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mALKhwwe002453;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:43:58 +0100
Received: from xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-332.cisco.com
[144.254.231.87])
by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mALKhwIf009486;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:43:58 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-33a.cisco.com ([144.254.231.85]) by
xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:43:57 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:43:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CE2BF2A7B1008C459FD7978065C6ECE007DD7CB0@xmb-ams-33a.emea.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8B6A9EC265011E4CB70F99C64426E8C2028C834526@rrc-dte-exmb2.dte.telcordia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawless in my experience
Thread-Index: AQHJTBcce0EvAs2SPUSVg98fYcD9oY8FmvxA
References: <8B6A9EC265011E4CB70F99C64426E8C2028C834526@rrc-dte-exmb2.dte.telcordia.com>
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "Haluska, John J" <jhaluska@telcordia.com>, <73attendees@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2008 20:43:57.0575 (UTC)
FILETIME=[E02DA170:01C94C19]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=784; t=1227300238; x=1228164238;
c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002;
h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
d=cisco.com; i=evyncke@cisco.com;
z=From:=20=22Eric=20Vyncke=20(evyncke)=22=20<evyncke@cisco.c
om> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[73attendees]=20The=20wireless=20covera
ge=20was=20flawless=20in=20my=20experience |Sender:=20;
bh=LTP+vsRAxv15RX4JwlDZXKPJrb0uxxC9h2jhkBNvI90=;
b=k1nqtdG4PbJQDieopgj0hWGdm+G08rQcWvM6jGdgXpmHMAQiK3LB4rOsTC
bm2Q5gOS5xafMz/FYw8j9f37W2E036jnE4jx/sHKIIADyf2FK5IimQ00TG9b
WZtAcz0htB;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=evyncke@cisco.com; dkim=pass (
sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Subject: Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawless in my experience
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
I lost my IPv6 connectivity several times, no due to a rogue RA, because I was receiving a ICMP network unreachable coming from a router from the right prefix... Else, I do agree, IPv4 connectivity was superb -éric > -----Original Message----- > From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Haluska, John J > Sent: vendredi 21 novembre 2008 21:24 > To: 73attendees@ietf.org > Subject: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawless in > my experience > > Thanks for the great network - I did not have a single issue > the entire time. > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawless … Haluska, John J
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Waclawsky John-A52165
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Richard Johnson
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… David B Harrington
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Dan Wing
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- [73attendees] first time in Minneapolis - discove… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [73attendees] The wireless coverage was flawl… Derek Atkins