Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Fri, 21 November 2008 22:50 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B01A3A682A;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88003A682A
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=-2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 3MBQ0xrn38Io for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.185])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6971B3A677E
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so1224802fkq.5
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=MW1OLeL59YWcGCkiM2EfXcFM/aJfjeeek/u8FKKS4Qc=;
b=hZSBPrW+G7+5cptclycmYMvQs+dV/JJWNmVXUkomhfrhnNBGgljq6/Fi5COtLzF24y
9W6Y19KHh+Q+8w7TweJsHqrUgLuGDjPSvW8p+5HDSuqYb8/G5RSzo16JgRJ/OyESvFaN
nq99m+opfQeL6OTasS5Npe/KHpjloYpTkMu6M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=ROzXPIAvbcAIOhxI2P6AGT+BpoRSlKjPBdQ5bO22iYdXF+7uF4uCmcB6RLJ0ViLboV
5Xu01BJsU+G0bca45LbPoyjF0sGgUCD6MHOPiJmoMFX7eHO+McoWA8d/cvlU43P5wYr3
PdsoqypBQYWT6+y28cUTC6FEH+kU5PMh8/A8M=
Received: by 10.180.249.4 with SMTP id w4mr293844bkh.162.1227307816836;
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.153.1 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:50:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60811211450q3832224dv3f0c80fb80de39ff@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:50:16 -0500
From: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "Andrew Allen" <aallen@rim.com>
In-Reply-To: <61968779B8AC4C4BAB421D4C12F008C015FE9BBF@XCH47YKF.rim.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AclLdCN9lxu+PT1yR/SpkaNPt1mdngAApNPL>
<61968779B8AC4C4BAB421D4C12F008C015FE9BBF@XCH47YKF.rim.net>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1171785265=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Why build one? We could have picked up the Queen's old ship a short while ago. Don't see how it is going to solve the visa problem though, not unless it is big enough to land a passenger jet on. On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Andrew Allen <aallen@rim.com> wrote: > > The SS Jon Postel? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org> > Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org <73attendees@ietf.org> > Sent: Thu Nov 20 19:55:42 2008 > Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of > draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? > > > >> > >> Is this thread still going? Heck, just hold it on a boat. Change the > >> IETF conference into an IETF cruise in international waters. > >> > > > > Just to be clear, unless the boat is an aircraft carrier, people will > > still need a visa to fly to where the ship is docked. > > > > Lets raise domain registrations to $100 per domain per year (not a big > deal for domain owners) and spend 85% of amount at Grumman Naval systems > (or another neat company) to build a nice carrier for community? I also > have several proposed names for the civil carrier. > > Having satellite uplinks, we can also run one completelly independent > copy of root nameservers. > > MK > > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > information, privileged material (including material protected by the > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your > system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees > -- Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime http://dotcrimemanifesto.com
_______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of draf… Andrew Allen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3of draf… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David B Harrington
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Tony Li
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… John C Klensin