Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Song Haibin <melodysong@huawei.com> Wed, 19 November 2008 02:07 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D3E3A6B3C;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:07:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A383A6B3C
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:07:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.726
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.726 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.873,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id p4IP0eqQdV5S for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:07:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6483A6883
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:07:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12])
by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KAK006405X8XY@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for
73attendees@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:07:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.12])
by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KAK00I5N5X8V6@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for
73attendees@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:07:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from s64081 ([10.164.12.12])
by szxml05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14
(built Aug
8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KAK009H45X7Z9@szxml05-in.huawei.com> for
73attendees@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:07:56 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:07:55 +0800
From: Song Haibin <melodysong@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <492325D1.7000703@cisco.com>
To: stbryant@cisco.com
Message-id: <01a101c949eb$a320ae60$0c0ca40a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-index: AclJvO+kJqoXiWXtR8Wd6rgVvqSx2QALT0OQ
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for
2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
>Well could you comment on the difficulty of getting >a Chinese visa to attend an ITU-T meeting in the run up to >the Olympics and the sudden change of application dates >and process by the Chinese government? I don't need to apply a Chinese visa, so I don't know the process. Just as Americans don't need to apply a US visa, so they don't experience my long time wait. But as far as I know, USA doesn't hold an Olympics in the coming months. I think Europe and Canada or Hongkong would be good choice. Song Haibin _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley