Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

"Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net> Tue, 18 November 2008 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06613A68AC; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:39:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1753A68AC; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:39:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.381, BAYES_40=-0.185, CN_BODY_103=0.327, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w54dmu4A76Sx; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:39:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og102.obsmtp.com (exprod7og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.157]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96D63A67E4; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:39:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from source ([66.129.228.6]) by exprod7ob102.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSSLhjp3JWMxLZKh+Hgz5xyIOvtfk8OLd@postini.com; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:39:03 PST
Received: from p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net ([66.129.254.47]) by p-emsmtp01.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:38:18 -0800
Received: from emailwf1.jnpr.net ([10.10.2.33]) by p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:38:18 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:37:38 -0500
Message-ID: <3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
Thread-Index: AclJkGwjWDnQ7PT9TKy4eR/M8U37wQAAVZBg
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn>
From: "Ross Callon" <rcallon@juniper.net>
To: =?GB2312?B?1cW5+se/?= <zhangguoqiang@cnnic.cn>, <healthyao@gmail.com>, <ietf@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2008 15:38:18.0228 (UTC) FILETIME=[ADD61B40:01C94993]
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

I agree that this has been a significant issue, and that it is not appropriate to have a large number of meetings in a location where a significant number of potential attendees cannot get a visa to attend. For this reason I have been an advocate of having a disproportionate number of the North American meetings in Canada rather than the USA (to me the Vancouver and Montreal locations have been just as convenient as nearby US locations, and I assume that there must also be suitable facilities in Toronto and elsewhere). 

One thing that I wonder about is whether or not this will get better with the change of administrations in January. Thus I would be interested in hearing at the next two US IETFs (San Francisco in March 2009, and Anaheim in March 2010) whether people have had an easier time than they did at the current or past IETFs. 

Ross 

-----Original Message-----
From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: 18 November 2008 10:15
To: healthyao@gmail.com; ietf@ietf.org
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

yes, it's really a problem that IETF meeting organizers should seriously consider.



在您的来信中曾经提到:
>From: "YAO" <healthyao@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: 
>To: <ietf@ietf.org>
>Subject: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
>Date:Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:24:41 +0800
>
>
> 
> according to IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04#section-2.3
> 
> which said "
> 
> 2.3.  Freedom of Participation
> 
>    Meetings should not be held in countries where some attendees could
>    be disallowed entry or where freedom of speech is not guaranteed for
>    all participants.
> "
> 
> My question is :"
> 
> Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria as
IETF Meeting Venue ?"
> 
> It seems that many IETFer are disallowed to enter USA for ietf meeting when ietf
is held in USA this time or other times
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>


_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees