IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

" 张国强 " <zhangguoqiang@cnnic.cn> Tue, 18 November 2008 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02433A6948; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:14:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9073A6948 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:14:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.468
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.163, BAYES_50=0.001, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_103=0.327, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rCmcWz0ez4l3 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:14:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E0D233A68F6 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:14:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: (eyou send program); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:14:36 +0800
Message-ID: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn>
Received: from 130.129.31.3 by mail.cnnic.cn with HTTP; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:14:36 +0800
X-WebMAIL-MUA: [130.129.31.3]
From: "=?gb2312?B?1cW5+se/?=" <zhangguoqiang@cnnic.cn>
To: healthyao@gmail.com, ietf@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:14:36 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: =?gb2312?B?1cW5+se/?= <zhangguoqiang@cnnic.cn>
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1429466247=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

yes, it's really a problem that IETF meeting organizers should seriously consider.



ÔÚÄúµÄÀ´ÐÅÖÐÔø¾­Ìáµ½:
>From: "YAO" <healthyao@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: 
>To: <ietf@ietf.org>
>Subject: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
>Date:Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:24:41 +0800
>
>
> 
> according to IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04#section-2.3
> 
> which said "
> 
> 2.3.  Freedom of Participation
> 
>    Meetings should not be held in countries where some attendees could
>    be disallowed entry or where freedom of speech is not guaranteed for
>    all participants.
> "
> 
> My question is :"
> 
> Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria as
IETF Meeting Venue ?"
> 
> It seems that many IETFer are disallowed to enter USA for ietf meeting when ietf
is held in USA this time or other times
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>



_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email