Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 18 November 2008 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66C028C131; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:26:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87CA28C131 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:26:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8+LRTiV2SI2 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E901028C125 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:26:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.78.48] (unknown [130.129.78.48]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24CA134E423C; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 09:27:02 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <EB207D30-9428-45E1-B402-7727A4FB4F6D@fugue.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
To: qdang@nist.gov
In-Reply-To: <20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:26:02 -0600
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn> <3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net> <20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On Nov 18, 2008, at 9:59 AM, qdang@nist.gov wrote:
> I believe our US government would like to grant visas to as many
> people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend a meeting in
> the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can imagine there will
> be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting in CA next year
> alone.

A tourist visa isn't that useful, and the criteria for getting it are  
fairly restrictive.   The criteria should allow anybody who is  
traveling to the U.S. on business to get one, and ought to exclude  
people who don't have visible means of support and a reason to return  
(I am not making a value judgment here, since I actually don't agree  
with U.S. policy on this, but simply stating what I understand the  
policy to be).

However unfortunately we have had increasing problems with the U.S.  
government being skeptical about visa applicants - several good  
friends of mine have been repeatedly denied entry to the U.S. because  
the person responsible for admitting them decided that they were at  
risk of overstaying their visa.   This is new, in the last year, and  
is the case even though these same people have a track record of /not/  
overstaying their visas based on past visits.   We recently tried to  
get a Tao master from China to come teach for a week, and despite  
repeated attempts, accompanied with excellent documentation, we were  
unable to get him a visa.

I don't think we can safely assume that the new administration will  
fix this problem quickly, because I think it's the result of an  
attitude shift at the department of state.   Shifting the attitude  
back in the right direction may be difficult.

So I think that the people here who are expressing concern about the  
ability to get across the border are talking about a real problem that  
probably will persist for a while, and I think the proposed solution-- 
having IETF conferences in Canada in preference to the U.S.--is  
probably a good one.   There are other North American locations that  
might work as well - Mexico City, for example.

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees