Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> Tue, 18 November 2008 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E092E28C20E; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:44:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E511728C20E for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:44:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ydm2lrhPlTB7 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (asmtp.apnic.net [202.12.29.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B9828C1F1 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:44:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.95.222] (unknown [130.129.95.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BC1110061 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:44:37 +1000 (EST)
Message-Id: <37352893-1CDB-430A-9751-16BA2B4898FC@apnic.net>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF04284E6B@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:44:34 -0600
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn><3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net><20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov> <A8EBCE2E-B035-4216-A1B1-247C3B3973B9@frobbit.se> <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF04284E6B@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

as Dr Strangelove tells us

"...this could easily be solved, with a computer ..."

-George

On 18/11/2008, at 10:41 AM, Eric Gray wrote:

> Yeah, I agree.  Having 100 million people show up at a Hilton
> hotel for a meeting would likely have us in litigation for
> decades.
>
> Of course, it would be interesting to try to determine how
> large an area would be covered by hotel bookings for so many
> attendees...
>
> --
> Eric Gray
> Principal Engineer
> Ericsson
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 11:29 AM
>> To: qdang@nist.gov
>> Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor
>> 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
>>
>> On 18 nov 2008, at 09.59, qdang@nist.gov wrote:
>>
>>> I believe our US government would like to grant visas to as many
>>> people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend a meeting in
>>> the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can imagine there will
>>> be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting in CA
>> next year
>>> alone.
>>
>> Having 100 million people paying the conference fee for the
>> next IETF
>> in San Francisco, just so they could get a 1-entry conference visa
>> (which is what India offers at no cost for the IGF in Hyderabad),
>> would radically change the economical situation for the IETF.
>>
>>    Patrik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 73attendees mailing list
>> 73attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
>>
> _______________________________________________
> 73attendees mailing list
> 73attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees