Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> Tue, 18 November 2008 16:44 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E092E28C20E;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:44:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E511728C20E
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:44:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Ydm2lrhPlTB7 for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (asmtp.apnic.net [202.12.29.51])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B9828C1F1
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:44:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.95.222] (unknown [130.129.95.222])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BC1110061
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:44:37 +1000 (EST)
Message-Id: <37352893-1CDB-430A-9751-16BA2B4898FC@apnic.net>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF04284E6B@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:44:34 -0600
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn><3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net><20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov>
<A8EBCE2E-B035-4216-A1B1-247C3B3973B9@frobbit.se>
<941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF04284E6B@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA
qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
as Dr Strangelove tells us "...this could easily be solved, with a computer ..." -George On 18/11/2008, at 10:41 AM, Eric Gray wrote: > Yeah, I agree. Having 100 million people show up at a Hilton > hotel for a meeting would likely have us in litigation for > decades. > > Of course, it would be interesting to try to determine how > large an area would be covered by hotel bookings for so many > attendees... > > -- > Eric Gray > Principal Engineer > Ericsson > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:73attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Patrik Fältström >> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 11:29 AM >> To: qdang@nist.gov >> Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor >> 2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria? >> >> On 18 nov 2008, at 09.59, qdang@nist.gov wrote: >> >>> I believe our US government would like to grant visas to as many >>> people as they can. However, if anyone wants to attend a meeting in >>> the US is granted a visa to come here, then I can imagine there will >>> be 100 million visa applications for the IETF meeting in CA >> next year >>> alone. >> >> Having 100 million people paying the conference fee for the >> next IETF >> in San Francisco, just so they could get a 1-entry conference visa >> (which is what India offers at no cost for the IGF in Hyderabad), >> would radically change the economical situation for the IETF. >> >> Patrik >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 73attendees mailing list >> 73attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees >> > _______________________________________________ > 73attendees mailing list > 73attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda