IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?

Matthew Ford <ford@isoc.org> Tue, 18 November 2008 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3434128C26E; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:53:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA453A685C for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:53:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U+l9ZAsR63pe for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:53:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp161.sat.emailsrvr.com (smtp161.sat.emailsrvr.com [66.216.121.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88B13A6B19 for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:53:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay16.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay16.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AEA291B5AD4; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:53:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: by relay16.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ford-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTP id 613E41B5AF0; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:53:49 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4923396C.4070708@isoc.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:53:48 -0600
From: Matthew Ford <ford@isoc.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)" <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
References: <C548F1DD.81336%jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <C548F1DD.81336%jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting." <73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>, <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org

On 18/11/08 14:27, Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo) wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> In the IAOC, we have followed the visa situation for different nations
> closely. It is obviously in the benefit for the IETF to have all the
> participants that want and need to come to the IETF could also come.

Seems like the UK might offer a solution:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7736010.stm

"officials were "under pressure" to issue - rather than reject - visas 
to meet productivity targets."


_______________________________________________
73attendees mailing list
73attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email