Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
"Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> Sat, 22 November 2008 19:15 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E763A6991;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:15:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43843A6991
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:15:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 5Ym5XKw0dc7k for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:15:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967DA3A680E
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1123158fga.41
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:15:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=60mdoCARYD+ahSX/kR6JmTOUW7/J3v9vCQhrBNrFHLs=;
b=L2oSBEvUYbOhzygpic/RgIC+XMncyd9AwsQpC63ytNpCYltqQWXcvB/2jkKL21RTFB
R2WUnqlqqwlZKLhQHxYx55On3JpLLJywjxhBK947Ye0Ol5sgOOSkGIgQkF0LFMpRCxK1
FSnQpl56uzNe9rzRUEjVQkj19c6Kg7/kExOn8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=RVhXHAQzR8gLzmEUS8uKE/sEIMUwC5qjadUSNVghs2RJjazr9qlWhFeNJNNRy6sDfd
IHldZi3Ky70/rTH6aDr6z77rB/3S7Rm4CyVpobhsg2DnX35BL6rX1nriUXDasIVSpf/2
TviLSIMYqaDfP8dL4hth8vJNajUhBLvXIMZNw=
Received: by 10.181.134.11 with SMTP id l11mr515257bkn.73.1227381352144;
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:15:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.181.153.1 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:15:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a123a5d60811221115j55502165v4855229c27816121@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:15:51 -0500
From: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com>
To: "Ole Jacobsen" <ole@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0811221105370.8444@pita.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811121117180.8743@toro.popovich.net>
<20081114202027.GA28598@gsp.org>
<046f01c94946$591904c0$236ff1da@yaojk>
<3c3e3fca0811201629h39689500mc7b23b2f7ffb6994@mail.gmail.com>
<a123a5d60811210913j62a9509fn45004d79472c956d@mail.gmail.com>
<3c3e3fca0811210917h652086d0lfaeff13937dfde35@mail.gmail.com>
<96152831-7235-446F-91F1-3B660BA431F3@muada.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.63.0811211732020.18335@pita.cisco.com>
<a123a5d60811221053n7b3b4ad6oc4cdc28e37b3ffc7@mail.gmail.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.63.0811221105370.8444@pita.cisco.com>
Cc: 73attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of
draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0152393957=="
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Well the first thing to do would be to ask if anyone on this list has a card in their file for someone who works at US state dept. Then we need to ask them what the problem is that they are trying to solve Then we need to put together a win-win proposal. And then we need someone with a measure of IETF authority (IAB, Chair or someone in the Secretariat) to pitch it. On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> wrote: > > Right, so what can we do to help? > > Ole > > On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > > The Chinese state dept and the US embassy in China spend much of their > time > > discussing precisely this sort of issue. That is their job. > > > -- Author: The dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime http://dotcrimemanifesto.com
_______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of draft-p… YAO
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… james woodyatt
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Song Haibin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Bob Hinden
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Simon Leinen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Michal Krsek
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… William Herrin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Paul, Manuel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3 of draf… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… John C Klensin
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Derek Atkins
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 of dra… Dale Worley