Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ?
Max Pala <pala@cs.dartmouth.edu> Tue, 18 November 2008 18:41 UTC
Return-Path: <73attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: 73attendees-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-73attendees-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C383A6885;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:41:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 73attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A85E3A6808
for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:41:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.069,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NgfhbZQKeDQY for <73attendees@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:41:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.dartmouth.edu (mail.cs.dartmouth.edu [129.170.212.100])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CDF3A68B9
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from titan.cs.dartmouth.edu ([130.129.78.202]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.cs.dartmouth.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mAIIffJp015012
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <73attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:41:46 -0500
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=cs.dartmouth.edu; c=nofws; q=dns;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:
references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=lMKchkaPpu9YFPjViQFf5zl5JE5pwNXiMi6ySOeRLjrhss18YFD5UudajosxrOsX5
srlQWSQOaqmG04sP78sJA==
Message-ID: <492263BE.8020009@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:42:06 -0600
From: Max Pala <pala@cs.dartmouth.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 73attendees@ietf.org
References: <427021276.00739@cnnic.cn><3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C051E2DD5@emailwf1.jnpr.net><20081118105949.108966jc49wwndyt@webmail.nist.gov><EB207D30-9428-45E1-B402-7727A4FB4F6D@fugue.com>
<57A45001-885D-4FD9-B461-C07BC671BEFA@muada.com>
<47951CBFA6409B4C8916514FCB05BFBE0543EFEA@xmb-sjc-219.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <47951CBFA6409B4C8916514FCB05BFBE0543EFEA@xmb-sjc-219.amer.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ?
X-BeenThere: 73attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for the attendees of IETF 73 meeting."
<73attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/73attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:73attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees>,
<mailto:73attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: 73attendees-bounces@ietf.org
Hello, I am sorry to say this mike, but hiding every problem behind the fear of 9/11 is not wise, and definitely not effective. Security can be achieved in many ways and denying a piece of paper is not one of those, IMHO. The issue of Visas for the IETF is serious, and definitely it should be addressed. There are many people that could help in this as they are involved with the US authorities - I hope that they will be willing to help for future meetings. Personally I support the idea of having more meetings in Canada (or better would be south-america - e.g., Argentina - during the winter :D) to allow more people to participate. Cheers, Mike McBride (mmcbride) wrote: > I, for one, I'm grateful the U.S. is a pain in the visa arse. In behalf > of my country, sorry for the headaches, but I think its fair to be a bit > skeptical after 9/11. More Canada mtgs sounds great. _______________________________________________ 73attendees mailing list 73attendees@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/73attendees
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3 ofdraf… 张国强
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ross Callon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… qdang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Eric Gray
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… George Michaelson
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Mike McBride (mmcbride)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randall Gellens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Scott Brim
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Melinda Shore
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ted Lemon
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Quigley
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Yi Zhao
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor 2.3ofdraft-… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… David Kessens
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified or not ? Massimiliano Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Gene Gaines
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dean Willis
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Matthew Ford
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Max Pala
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USAqualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-pa… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fernando Gont
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Fred Baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… James Seng
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Tom.Petch
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… YAO Jiankang
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualifiedfor2.3ofdraft-p… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for2.3ofdraft-… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Jari Arkko
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [73attendees] IsUSA qualified for 2.3ofdraft-… Randy Bush
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [73attendees] Is USA qualified for 2.3ofdraft… Raj Yaralagadda