IETF Logo Mail Archive

[75attendees] See why there aren't that much historical schips

"Teco Boot" <teco@inf-net.nl> Thu, 30 July 2009 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <teco@inf-net.nl>
X-Original-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAD73A68A9 for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.519
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.023, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA_OBFU=1.812, SARE_URI_REPLICA=1.634]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vkOmYIXr0VUu for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server9.hosting2go.nl (server9.hosting2go.nl [83.137.194.84]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9461C28C198 for <75attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9867 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2009 12:09:02 +0200
Received: from dhcp-15cb.meeting.ietf.org (HELO M90Teco) (130.129.21.203) by server9.hosting2go.nl with SMTP; 30 Jul 2009 12:09:02 +0200
From: Teco Boot <teco@inf-net.nl>
To: 75attendees@ietf.org
References: <4A6F6D31.7040305@sri.com> <4A6F6E10.6030204@stpeter.im> <4A6F71C4.2040309@reedcat.net> <05a501ca10ad$6eed6a00$7958404e@china.huawei.com> <4A713CCB.6060906@sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A713CCB.6060906@sri.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:08:29 +0200
Message-ID: <01b301ca10fd$c2305c40$469114c0$@nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcoQ3oolAL649C8EQuawb82cZuhlvQAHn5zw
Content-Language: nl
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: Hy4= AYiG A8CG CGgj Cb9I CqGP DmAL ES/l FfV9 GKxV Ggv7 Gl4Q H9kG IGE8 Iam9 IyaK; 1; NwA1AGEAdAB0AGUAbgBkAGUAZQBzAEAAaQBlAHQAZgAuAG8AcgBnAA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {F8F5F2A5-B797-4D31-ACF7-497863BDF523}; dABlAGMAbwBAAGkAbgBmAC0AbgBlAHQALgBuAGwA; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:08:25 GMT; UwBlAGUAIAB3AGgAeQAgAHQAaABlAHIAZQAgAGEAcgBlAG4AJwB0ACAAdABoAGEAdAAgAG0AdQBjAGgAIABoAGkAcwB0AG8AcgBpAGMAYQBsACAAcwBjAGgAaQBwAHMA
x-cr-puzzleid: {F8F5F2A5-B797-4D31-ACF7-497863BDF523}
Subject: [75attendees] See why there aren't that much historical schips
X-BeenThere: 75attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <75attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/75attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:75attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:09:37 -0000

Enjoyed the experience visiting a historical ship?
Don't postpone if you want more. This night, we lost a replica.
http://www.zie.nl/videos/brand-verwoest-replica-voc-schip/m1dz3e7fxvt8

Teco.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email