IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [75attendees] No PGP Key Signing session??

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Tue, 28 July 2009 08:19 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3E13A6CD9 for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.110, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQJhYH9gQiwB for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (sequoia.muada.com [83.149.65.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A3F3A6D70 for <75attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 01:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-55f3.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-55f3.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.85.243] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6S8IUWK074026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:18:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <B575FAE6-39E3-4DDE-B59F-A95E7E731309@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <p0625011bc69462be37e5@[10.4.39.11]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:18:47 +0200
References: <87prblgxjn.fsf@tower.fukt.bsnet.se> <4B4DFB71-0170-4E3B-8E6C-B9D285DF237F@muada.com> <p0625011bc69462be37e5@[10.4.39.11]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: 75attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [75attendees] No PGP Key Signing session??
X-BeenThere: 75attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <75attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/75attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:75attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:19:10 -0000

On 28 jul 2009, at 10:13, Pete Resnick wrote:

> I think checking government IDs is a TERRIBLE idea (though you are  
> certainly allowed to do so). When I sign a key, I am saying that *I*  
> know the person.

There's a difference between knowing the person and knowing the  
person's identity...

> Personally, if I think you have signed someone's key because you  
> checked their government ID, I will not trust your signature.

Truth in advertising is all we can ask for.

BTW, was friday 7.30 - 9 AM or PM? There wouldn't be any BoFs at  
either time, and I would _hope_ there are no bar BoFs at 7.30 in the  
morning...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email