Re: [75attendees] No PGP Key Signing session??

Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com> Tue, 28 July 2009 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <pfaltstr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 75attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF543A6CE1 for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.883, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AEGDz0ld-j7q for <75attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5633A687A for <75attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Files: PGP.sig : 186
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAANHbkqrR7O6/2dsb2JhbAC6AIgnjy8FhAw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.43,281,1246838400"; d="sig'?scan'208"; a="190195851"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2009 07:33:00 +0000
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6S7X0kP004024; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:33:00 -0700
Received: from xbh-ams-101.cisco.com (xbh-ams-101.cisco.com [144.254.74.71]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6S7WxqM004903; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:33:00 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-332.cisco.com ([144.254.231.73]) by xbh-ams-101.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:32:59 +0200
Received: from dhcp-17cb.meeting.ietf.org ([10.61.69.207]) by xfe-ams-332.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:32:59 +0200
Message-Id: <9BA9884A-5819-4477-94EB-6F08E7631ACF@cisco.com>
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B4DFB71-0170-4E3B-8E6C-B9D285DF237F@muada.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Apple-Mail-69--123760962"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:32:58 +0200
References: <87prblgxjn.fsf@tower.fukt.bsnet.se> <4B4DFB71-0170-4E3B-8E6C-B9D285DF237F@muada.com>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail d55 (v55, Leopard)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2009 07:32:59.0246 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1AB10E0:01CA0F55]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1294; t=1248766380; x=1249630380; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=paf@cisco.com; z=From:=20=3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=3DE4ltstr=3DF6m?=3D=20<p af@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[75attendees]=20No=20PGP=20Key=20Signin g=20session?? |Sender:=20; bh=+LmBI2kfB40M8BiZK/iiK00VPInNHExY/+MZ10v/HA4=; b=X80Nmem7t+T6VKhFHEa2Mn8HKSlmvLO5hkaLM5fyXrJhzTLrCzDYBEkdnP 8/UuKJfbIbfjKjdO0AAdcziIRu4P1djrLK4DZPvcOGJq0Al6nQpQjAkems4t 8xPcx4quJs;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=paf@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Cc: 75attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [75attendees] No PGP Key Signing session??
X-BeenThere: 75attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <75attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/75attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:75attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/75attendees>, <mailto:75attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:33:01 -0000

On 28 jul 2009, at 09.22, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> On 28 jul 2009, at 7:57, Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
>
>> I am very surprised to NOT see a PGP signing session on the agenda  
>> for
>> IETF 75 .  Is there an unofficial one planned outside the agenda?
>
> What I understand is that there is no checking of government IDs at  
> theses IETF PGP signing sessions. That doesn't seem very useful to  
> me...

That is completely up to you. If you want to see the ID of someone  
before you sign that persons key, just request it.

    Patrik -- has checked ID at IETF PGP Key Signing Session last time  
in Dublin (my last such session)