IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [76attendees] RFID

Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr> Tue, 10 November 2009 02:06 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21A73A67A2 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:06:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.061
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.061 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.915, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1l5KqpCgHAR3 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pw0-f50.google.com (mail-pw0-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08423A6944 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pwi6 with SMTP id 6so784137pwi.29 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:06:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=3DNw95fP+2k6fEoirQbrbxfhxZO1hfHhj4PWAxvWfQQ=; b=Z2bSSD6tx7qKnZt9nODY/j5SNvh2J2OeiJSo+mmWUw61jQkhABdVnB314kIGQ9cgPl L+NAAelk+uM2IYjITiUEK3Ro+TbDWhuq3r0QKdpY49fzULGqk3xbgjP/b0YfCo03cmZU iUmO9mZNPfeQ0DNLG/Tx2qsSj2FGk1+gTVXSU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=EjSrJ6WrmOr/1MZLLVPBxzxuv31C6+HfTyXl+bAOhIf/TOgfwrTbJS/iozSvf0I3q4 +2TTCVHQOWiEpwlX+ntAUEQW/XnkmQeIVtLMv6gBxFknMum+ZTtuQ9McbeehydDpGzrh eRuG7m0Vk5YOlMa73SUwlcqjLmVllL/jMmBsk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dykim6@gmail.com
Received: by 10.143.138.7 with SMTP id q7mr888634wfn.314.1257818797152; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:06:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com>
References: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:06:37 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6cadf39c7275568c
Message-ID: <3938a04d0911091806n4df75de1sf46d4ce2e153449b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd5f6fa989ac70477fac2b1"
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:06:15 -0000

I find it very useful. Especially, to be able to get the names of speakers
at the mikes.

Privacy is not an issue here, I think. People already chose to post any
non-critical personal information at logging in onto the main page.
Attending an open meeting shouldn't be a privacy issue. If you're concerned,
you can just choose not to swipe the card against the reader.

Although it should be very convenient, automatic detection through the gates
is not a recommendable way. This then begins to touch on some privacy
concern, I think.

One more thing. More stable operation of the card reading would be
desirable.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

> I'm sure this will come up in the IAOC survey next week, but I'm curious to
> ask now about the RFID experiment now that we have had a day or so using it.
>
> What do people think of it? Is it useful/interesting? If we were to make it
> more functional, such as enabling it to be read at the door obviating the
> blue sheet, would that be a good direction? I recognize that there are
> security concerns; what would be the best way to obviate them?
> _______________________________________________
> 76attendees mailing list
> 76attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees
>



-- 
Regards,

DY
http://cnu.kr/~dykim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email