IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [76attendees] Warnings re: Oriental Hotel

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Mon, 09 November 2009 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB523A6A41 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:23:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6GT-cYlwLtF6 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail161.messagelabs.com (mail161.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.115]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C523A6A35 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:23:46 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-161.messagelabs.com!1257726250!33943681!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.1.3; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 28273 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2009 00:24:11 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-12.tower-161.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Nov 2009 00:24:11 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA90OAEV018488 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:24:10 -0600
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA90O5PX018451 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:24:06 -0600
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA90O5wV018171 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:24:05 -0500
Received: from maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA90NwvT018106 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:23:59 -0500
Received: from [135.70.27.20] (vpn-135-70-27-20.vpn.west.att.com[135.70.27.20]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20091109002358gw10014qu1e> (Authid: tony); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:23:58 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.27.20]
Message-ID: <4AF7611C.4040506@att.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:23:56 -0500
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 76attendees@ietf.org
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0911061557460.99602@fledge.watson.org> <1257689426.3979.19.camel@khone.us.nortel.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0911080611390.15621@pita.cisco.com> <5F8DB291-9DFE-464D-96DB-9996D4E531B8@xs4all.nl> <8CC2426F-A8DD-4607-8AF5-DB83D7C4D9E7@fugue.com> <20091108222402.GA21078@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <m2tyx4a7fh.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2tyx4a7fh.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [76attendees] Warnings re: Oriental Hotel
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:23:47 -0000

I was here for the codesprint on Saturday, and an interesting happened 
early on that day: IPv4 stopped working but IPv6 ran just fine. (It 
turned out to be a routing issue.) It was kind of entertaining seeing 
which sites still worked and which didn't. I was pleasantly surprised at 
the number of random sites I *was* able to get to.

	Tony Hansen
	tony@att.com

Randy Bush wrote:
>> I thought it was common in Japan, often cited for its IPv6
>> progress.
> 
> yes, often cited.
> 
>> You mean that, outside of the IETF, there is no IPv6 in hotel rooms in
>> Japan (for instance for wedding parties)?
> 
> ipv6 is not very widely actually deployed in japan.  more powerpoint
> than packets.
> 
> randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email