IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [76attendees] Errors in RFID database??

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Mon, 09 November 2009 05:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FBA3A68CB for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:58:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZFCa8qTrvCK for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:58:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail121.messagelabs.com (mail121.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25BB3A684C for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:58:52 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-121.messagelabs.com!1257746357!31173338!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.1.3; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 22293 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2009 05:59:17 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-5.tower-121.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Nov 2009 05:59:17 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA95xGst024253 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:59:17 -0600
Received: from klpd017.kcdc.att.com (klpd017.kcdc.att.com [135.188.40.86]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA95xB3W024194 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:59:12 -0600
Received: from kcdc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA95xBMX017428 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:59:11 -0600
Received: from maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by klpd017.kcdc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA95x67M017394 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:59:06 -0600
Received: from [135.70.189.172] (vpn-135-70-189-172.vpn.mwst.att.com[135.70.189.172]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20091109055904gw10014quie> (Authid: tony); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:59:05 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.189.172]
Message-ID: <4AF7AFA7.8060800@att.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:59:03 -0500
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 76attendees@ietf.org
References: <4AF7AC0E.6070608@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AF7AC0E.6070608@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [76attendees] Errors in RFID database??
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 05:58:53 -0000

yes, I was in Cattleya West at the ISOC AC yesterday and it showed up as

Newcomer's Training	Acacia East  	2009-11-08 16:31:33

	Tony Hansen
	tony@att.com

Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> In my RFID records I find:
> 
> RFC Editor Tutorial  	Acacia West     2009-11-08 12:51:05
> 
> Not correct, I was presenting in Acacia East
> 
> EAP Method Update WG  	Cattleya East  	2009-11-09 14:23:26
> 
> Not correct, I was at the microphone in Orchid East
> 
> I think some of the readers are not where the database
> believes they are. Did anyone else notice errors like this?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email