Re: [76attendees] RFID
Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Tue, 10 November 2009 03:02 UTC
Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EC73A68E6 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:02:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u5Ep+Jvsmc6j for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:02:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail146.messagelabs.com (mail146.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790573A6836 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:02:02 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-146.messagelabs.com!1257822147!14509254!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25]
Received: (qmail 29169 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2009 03:02:27 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-11.tower-146.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Nov 2009 03:02:27 -0000
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAA32RgE018061 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:02:27 -0600
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAA32NQn017545 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:02:23 -0600
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAA32Nhx027705 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:02:23 -0500
Received: from maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAA32Lfu027689 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:02:22 -0500
Received: from [135.70.103.87] (vpn-135-70-103-87.vpn.swst.att.com[135.70.103.87]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20091110030220gw10014q4ne> (Authid: tony); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:02:21 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.103.87]
Message-ID: <4AF8D7B9.5000604@att.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:02:17 -0500
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 76attendees@ietf.org
References: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com> <3938a04d0911091806n4df75de1sf46d4ce2e153449b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3938a04d0911091806n4df75de1sf46d4ce2e153449b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:02:03 -0000
I've seen two different interpretations of "having a card reader at the door": 1) a scanner that tracks everyone as they enter or exit the door, and 2) a reader sitting at the door that you can swipe your badge on as you enter as an alternative to the blue sheets. I would find the former troublesome, but not the latter. Another alternative to the card reader at the door is something I saw at one of yesterday's sessions: a card reader passed along with the blue sheets. (Would that be an eBlueSheet (tm)? :-) ) However, there was only one of those and the *other* blue sheet clip board did not have its own card reader. A couple further thoughts: *) With the blue sheets, we have parallelism as multiple sheets are passed around the room. Swiping a reader that's being passed around would be faster, so this might not be much of an issue. If this were chosen as the working model, it might be better to have two of the readers. *) A number of people, such as WG chairs, come early to a meeting to set up. And at the end of a meeting, the WG chairs will often hold up the blue sheets to get any one to sign up that missed signing in earlier. A eBlueSheet needs to be able to handle both of these cases, and differentiate signins between meetings. Tony Hansen tony@att.com Dae Young KIM wrote: > > Although it should be very convenient, automatic detection through the > gates is not a recommendable way. This then begins to touch on some > privacy concern, I think.
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Jared Mauch
- [76attendees] RFID Fred Baker
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Derek Atkins
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Randy Bush
- Re: [76attendees] RFID vijay gill
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Randy Bush
- Re: [76attendees] RFID vijay gill
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Samuel Weiler
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Muhammad Yousaf
- Re: [76attendees] RFID John G. Scudder
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [76attendees] RFID vijay gill
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Lars Eggert
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Paul Hoffman
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Soininen, Jonne (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [76attendees] RFID John G. Scudder
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Scott Brim
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Randy Bush
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Ted Lemon
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [76attendees] RFID George, Wes E [NTK]
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Scott Brim
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Dae Young KIM
- Re: [76attendees] RFID YAO Jiankang
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Tony Hansen
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Shridhar Rao (shrirao)
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Wes Hardaker
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Joe Touch
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Rob Evans
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Samuel Weiler
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Ray.Bellis
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Pete Resnick
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Aaron Falk
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Thomas Heide Clausen
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Scott Brim
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [76attendees] RFID John G. Scudder
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Joe Touch
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [76attendees] RFID Tero Kivinen