Re: [76attendees] RFID

Jared Mauch <jmauch@us.ntt.net> Tue, 10 November 2009 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jmauch@us.ntt.net>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316433A69F1 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:12:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 365Hj-Cw8d7P for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5A63A68E0 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:12:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host-24-48.meeting.ietf.org (host-24-48.meeting.ietf.org [133.93.24.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by puck.nether.net (8.14.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id nAA1E0Uq096897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 20:14:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jmauch@us.ntt.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Jared Mauch <jmauch@us.ntt.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AF8BCCB.6010204@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:13:10 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FEBADF2A-6046-49C4-B99E-28DBAF4802FF@us.ntt.net>
References: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com> <4AF8BCCB.6010204@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:14:03 -0500 (EST)
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:12:51 -0000

On Nov 9, 2009, at 8:07 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

>> What do people think of it? Is it useful/interesting? If we were to make
>> it more functional, such as enabling it to be read at the door obviating
>> the blue sheet, would that be a good direction? I recognize that there
>> are security concerns; what would be the best way to obviate them?
> 
> imiho, the privacy issues is a flat show stopper

I see no issues, you are not stopped for not having a badge/RFID card, nor are you stopped for not signing the blue sheets.

While it may be expected, it's certainly not enforced as a requirement.  If you don't like it, you can always remove the chip/antenna.

I think that having readers at the doorway would be of value, perhaps with one that allows you to sign-out (eg: if you are going to another WG at same time).

I understand some folks don't like the privacy issues around this, unless there are the IETF police stationed at each door.

	- Jared