Re: [76attendees] Soccer, part III

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Sat, 31 October 2009 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9AA3A6847 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.056
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.246, BAYES_05=-1.11, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pnTwYiQGVsaM for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gs19.inmotionhosting.com (gs19b.inmotionhosting.com [66.117.3.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C163A67DB for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip68-100-199-8.dc.dc.cox.net ([68.100.199.8] helo=[192.168.15.199]) by gs19.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1N4MB5-00056u-Na; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:12:07 -0700
Message-Id: <73BC3AED-C242-4FC7-B3FF-F0983A178AE3@standardstrack.com>
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?JINMEI_Tatuya_/_=E7=A5=9E=E6=98=8E=E9=81=94=E5=93=89?= <jinmei@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2vdhwin8g.wl%jinmei@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:12:09 -0400
References: <A8A687DF-5FBC-4B29-B5BC-5E93AE4D133D@standardstrack.com> <200910271237.n9RCbuWh084334@stora.ogud.com> <5079E52C-9480-4CAB-ABF2-AB24E63C7AEB@standardstrack.com> <m2639yjfle.wl%jinmei@isc.org> <m21vkljrt5.wl%jinmei@isc.org> <4AEAD7DC.6020904@gont.com.ar> <m2vdhwin8g.wl%jinmei@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gs19.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] Soccer, part III
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:11:59 -0000

Any idea how booked the futsal courts are? My guess is if we have  
extra people, but there are usually open courts, it would not be a  
problem to get an ad hoc court.

On Oct 30, 2009, at 5:30 PM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:

> At Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:11:08 -0200,
> Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>; wrote:
>
>> With fourteen people (and probably a few more, that simply didn't  
>> fill
>> out the doodle form) it might be a good to get a full soccer court.  
>> For
>> playing 11-11 players in the field, or 9-9, or whatever. If not,  
>> maybe
>> we could have two futsal courts?
>
> If we need to cancel the futsal court we should do it by Nov 4 (Wed)
> to avoid penalty.  Frankly, I'm pessimistic about reserving a full
> soccer court, but if many others want me to try it, I will.  As for
> another futsal court, it cannot be an option, unfortunately: we are a
> "visitor", and visitors can only reserve a single court at one time.
>
> ---
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.