IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [76attendees] Errors in RFID database??

中村 修 <osamu@wide.ad.jp> Mon, 09 November 2009 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <osamu@wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B184C3A6AFA for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:02:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.19
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KchNuD+Qz38F for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:02:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.142.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F7C3A67A7 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:02:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host-16-33.meeting.ietf.org (host-16-33.meeting.ietf.org [133.93.16.33]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61C014C0AD; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:02:29 +0900 (JST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-35-273674952"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: 中村 修 <osamu@wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4AF7CBD2.7030004@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:02:29 +0900
Message-Id: <F80FBE56-0700-4247-BDC4-EEB66D5B844B@wide.ad.jp>
References: <4AF7AC0E.6070608@gmail.com> <9e8bc9820911082248s5b5dbf1bkbdb79d4405867e0e@mail.gmail.com> <4AF7BE7C.3010005@isi.edu> <3DE0C732-FB72-4221-A990-ABFB9F9547D2@wide.ad.jp> <4AF7CBD2.7030004@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] Errors in RFID database??
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:02:07 -0000

we are still missing EAP method Update WG swapped IntArea data.
I will fix soon.

		osamu


On 2009/11/09, at 16:59, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Much better now, but this one is still wrong:
>
> EAP Method Update WG  	Cattleya East 	2009-11-09 14:23:26
>
> I was actually in Orchid East then.
>
>   Brian
>
> On 2009-11-09 20:42, 中村 修 wrote:
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> We fixed the missing records.
>> could you check, if you appreciate ?
>>
>>    osamu
>>
>>
>> On 2009/11/09, at 16:02, Joe Touch wrote:
>>
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ed Juskevicius wrote:
>>>> My RFID records for today (so far) are far from complete.
>>>
>>> Errors in mine too.
>>>
>>> Missing IntArea
>>>
>>> Shows me in EAP Method Update WG at times I was elsewhere, and my  
>>> card
>>> is shielded when not used at a reader (i.e., these should not be
>>> aliases).
>>>
>>> Joe
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
>>>
>>> iEYEARECAAYFAkr3vnsACgkQE5f5cImnZrsnmwCg/kVetwmy7I9s3PjIYxxzgrZJ
>>> LQMAoII6mJAlMdFeoqeFHxseVu7x0paQ
>>> =WfHX
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 76attendees mailing list
>>> 76attendees@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 76attendees mailing list
>> 76attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email