Re: [76attendees] Rogue IPv6 RA

Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@wide.ad.jp> Mon, 09 November 2009 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sekiya@wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218623A68A5 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 02:54:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.127
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.127 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VciU0xeJmOZB for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 02:54:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from azusa.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (azusa.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [130.69.251.120]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657193A67A4 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 02:54:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 59.214.180.203.d.iijmobile.jp.wide.ad.jp (host-24-21.meeting.ietf.org [133.93.24.21]) by azusa.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387808280AE; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:55:14 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:55:13 +0900
Message-ID: <m2my2w9dda.wl%sekiya@wide.ad.jp>
From: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@wide.ad.jp>
To: Arifumi Matsumoto <arifumi@nttv6.net>
In-Reply-To: <66346671-3773-4A08-94CB-7A777C105631@nttv6.net>
References: <m24op4b94l.wl%sekiya@wide.ad.jp> <66346671-3773-4A08-94CB-7A777C105631@nttv6.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.2.50 (i386-apple-darwin9.4.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Organization: The University of Tokyo
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] Rogue IPv6 RA
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:54:49 -0000

At Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:52:48 +0900,
Arifumi Matsumoto wrote:

> IIRC, routerlifetime and address lifetime is not correlated.
>
> So, that address can be used for the source address for
> outgoing sessions, right ?

I think some of implementation bind prefix and its default
router, so default router is expired, the prefix is not
selected as source address.

-- Yuji Sekiya