Re: [76attendees] RFID blocker card

"George, Wes E [NTK]" <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com> Sun, 08 November 2009 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133333A69B4 for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:46:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2yb71RBhJSHP for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VA3EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (va3ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFDB3A69A5 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:46:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail13-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.235) by VA3EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.7.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.340.0; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 04:47:15 +0000
Received: from mail13-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail13-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2A61088773; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 04:47:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -40
X-BigFish: VS-40(zz542N98dN4015L9371Pba9lzz1202hzz1033ILz2fh87h176h6bh61h)
X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0
X-FB-DOMAIN-IP-MATCH: fail
Received: from mail13-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail13-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1257655635446218_3546; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 04:47:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.250]) by mail13-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6947015A0057; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 04:47:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plsasdm2.corp.sprint.com (144.230.168.26) by VA3EHSMHS032.bigfish.com (10.7.99.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.482.32; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 04:47:15 +0000
Received: from PLSWH02A.ad.sprint.com (PLSWH02A.corp.sprint.com [144.226.242.131]) by plsasdm2.corp.sprint.com (Sentrion-MP-4.0.0/Sentrion-MP-4.0.0) with ESMTP id nA84lCSW023544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:47:13 -0600
Received: from PLSWM01C.ad.sprint.com ([144.226.242.77]) by PLSWH02A.ad.sprint.com ([2002:90e2:f283::90e2:f283]) with mapi; Sat, 7 Nov 2009 22:47:12 -0600
From: "George, Wes E [NTK]" <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>, 中村 修 <osamu@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:47:10 -0600
Thread-Topic: [76attendees] RFID blocker card
Thread-Index: AcpgLhrNagZDoYfsS8iwc9KZ1B4kQgAADuwQ
Message-ID: <F7EB0A7C707E39409A73CD0353242551A8873B23E7@PLSWM01C.ad.sprint.com>
References: <4AF646BD.9060001@viagenie.ca> <8A45C13C-CF88-4C10-90E0-2BD1DD58016B@wide.ad.jp> <4AF64C89.6010108@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4AF64C89.6010108@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Reverse-DNS: smtpls2.sprint.com
Cc: "76attendees@ietf.org" <76attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID blocker card
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:46:52 -0000

If as indicated on the materials, only a number (and no personal information) is stored on the RFID card, why would skimming be a concern? Is this just standard procedure when doing tests of this type to supply a shield?


Thanks,
Wes

-----Original Message-----
From: 76attendees-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:76attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Simon Perreault
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 11:44 PM
To: 中村 修
Cc: 76attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID blocker card

中村 修 wrote:
> If you stack RFID card and the skimming protection card(which is black
> one),
> your RFID card will be safe from skimming.

This confuses me again.

Is the lawful act of reading the card for blue-sheeting purposes
considered skimming or not?

If I want to opt-in, should I do this or not?

Simon
--
DNS64 open-source   --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server    --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0           --> http://www.vcarddav.org
_______________________________________________
76attendees mailing list
76attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees

This e-mail may contain Sprint Nextel Company proprietary information intended for the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message.