Re: [76attendees] RFID

"Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@digium.com> Tue, 10 November 2009 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <kpfleming@digium.com>
X-Original-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 76attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BCA3A695F for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:02:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.34
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8t5Z4zWcgUz for <76attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:02:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.digium.com (mail.digium.com [216.207.245.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200403A6959 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:02:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jupiler.digium.internal ([10.19.29.150] helo=jupiler.digium.com) by mail.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kpfleming@digium.com>) id 1N7f7t-00061Y-Av for 76attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:02:29 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jupiler.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F9ADFC847 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:02:29 -0600 (CST)
Received: from jupiler.digium.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jupiler.digium.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I0NpM1dl4N53 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:02:28 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [133.93.24.160] (host-24-160.meeting.ietf.org [133.93.24.160]) (Authenticated sender: kpfleming) by jupiler.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50BADFC827 for <76attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:02:27 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <4AF8BBA1.20504@digium.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:02:25 +0900
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@digium.com>
Organization: Digium, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: 76attendees@ietf.org
References: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7BAB4E87-5B63-4FC9-A6CF-576EB180A6C0@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
OpenPGP: id=05FB8DB2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [76attendees] RFID
X-BeenThere: 76attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <76attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/76attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:76attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/76attendees>, <mailto:76attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:02:04 -0000

Fred Baker wrote:

> What do people think of it? Is it useful/interesting? If we were to make
> it more functional, such as enabling it to be read at the door obviating
> the blue sheet, would that be a good direction? I recognize that there
> are security concerns; what would be the best way to obviate them?

As a new attendee, I don't have much experience to draw on, but I think
passing the electronic bluesheet around the room is a good method; I
would prefer not to have it read at the door.

-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
skype: kpfleming | jabber: kpfleming@digium.com
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org